Posted on 05/17/2007 10:08:04 AM PDT by Gamecock
When it comes to religion, people are always "stuck with" something or other, so there's not need for the snideness.
Exactly.
A thing is what it is. Calling it by another name doesn’t make it that. Part of the horror of the politically correct is to either lump in evil with good, or to change the meanings of words to confuse the two.
Calling a cat a dog doesn’t make it one.
I also noted that Calvin and Luther did no miracles. Maybe that was not so nice on my part...I can understand if someone might have been annoyed by my posting about Luther and Calvin.
Respectfully, you're not getting it. We are DELIGHTED to testify that neither Calvin nor Luther performed any miracles.
And as a bonus, we'll stipulate that neither man should be made a saint of the Roman Catholic Church.
However, let it be further stipulated that we are confident both men were ordained by God to correct and cleanse His church and both men are now happily residing in heaven where they await all those who trust and believe in His name, as He promised and Scripture attests.
The burden of proof is on the affirmative.
The affirmative of this particular voodoo has failed.
Yeah, some of that, too. 8~)
If someone had smacked him on the head that dead cat would have gone flying.
I haven't the slightest idea what you are talking about. Where on this thread have I used the word papist?
I have several very conservative Protestant pastors and theologians (some of national reputation) as my good friends.
The author of the posted thread is one with quite a good Reformed reputation....
"Unproven" and "lie" are not synonyms.
-A8
Harley didn’t say he wasn’t a Christian...just that he wasn’t a Catholic (Roman)
Exactly correct.
Kind of like Hillary calling herself "moderate" and "straight."
If that was gamecock’s point, it is not a good one. Even if I thought Mormonism was Christian, which I don’t, it would make no sense to refer to Mormons (when one wants to refer to them SPECIFICALLY) as simply “Christians”. In the same way, if one wants to refer SPECIFICALLY to squirrels, one does not say “mammals”.
There is a denomination called “the Church of Christ”. It is a proper name. If I referred to that Church I would refer to it as “the Church of Christ”, even though I do not grant, as a matter theology, that that denomination is THE Church of Christ. I call Orthodox Christians “Orthodox”, because that is the term that they use, even though I do not grant, as a matter of theology, that they are in fact orthodox. They are 99.9% orthodox. One cannot please everybody; but, normally, one tries to apply to people and institutions the proper names they give themselves, and one avoids terms that are generally regarded as hostile, unless, of course, one is attempting to express hostility.
Romanoid! LOL.
Would you prefer the phrase "manipulated fantasy?"
Put your hand on the monitor, send $5.00 to my PayPal account and tell me how you feel:
I feel better... after, you ARE now a doctor.
Nahhhhhh, that was Blinking Robert Tilton with his infamous scam of "point of contact receiving of miracles", whereby he spat out a line of jibberish, eyes wildly blinking, holding his finger up to the camera, so the TV audience could make a "point of contact" with his finger through the TV screen and receive their miracle.
In college he was a great source of entertainment.
Now, it's just sad how he drug the name of Christ through the mud.
Without offense to the Irish of course! ;)
You guys ought to straighten out some of your buddies on those islands out there in the North Atlantic...sometimes they forget whence they came!
I can smile. Just can’t do the LOL thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.