Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ears_to_hear
As a Presbyterian I also believe in the real presence of Christ to the saved at communion as His spiritual presence is as real as a physical one.

Praise God that you believe that as well!

I understand what you are saying about the Passover meal in typology.

One thing to remember, though, is what St. Paul said in 1 Cor 11:29 ("For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself.")

And one must remember Jesus' own teaching on the subject

Jhn 6:31   Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'"
Jhn 6:32   Jesus then said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven; my Father gives you the true bread from heaven.
Jhn 6:33   For the bread of God is that which comes down from heaven, and gives life to the world."
Jhn 6:34   They said to him, "Lord, give us this bread always."
Jhn 6:35   Jesus said to them, "I am the bread of life; he who comes to me shall not hunger, and he who believes in me shall never thirst.
Jhn 6:36   But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe.
Jhn 6:37   All that the Father gives me will come to me; and him who comes to me I will not cast out.
Jhn 6:38   For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me;
Jhn 6:39   and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day.
Jhn 6:40   For this is the will of my Father, that every one who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day."
Jhn 6:41   The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, "I am the bread which came down from heaven."
Jhn 6:42   They said, "Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does he now say, 'I have come down from heaven'?"
Jhn 6:43   Jesus answered them, "Do not murmur among yourselves.
Jhn 6:44   No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day.
Jhn 6:45   It is written in the prophets, 'And they shall all be taught by God.' Every one who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me.
Jhn 6:46   Not that any one has seen the Father except him who is from God; he has seen the Father.
Jhn 6:47   Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life.
Jhn 6:48   I am the bread of life.
Jhn 6:49   Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died.
Jhn 6:50   This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man may eat of it and not die.
Jhn 6:51   I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh."
Jhn 6:52   The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"
Jhn 6:53   So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you;
Jhn 6:54   he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.
Jhn 6:55   For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
Jhn 6:56   He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
Jhn 6:57   As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me.
Jhn 6:58   This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever."

He's very explicit there in what he taught...and many of his disciples were disturbed by his teaching and left that day (cf John 6:66). If he were speaking in allegories, why would they have been disturbed?

By the way, do you have a reference for the Matzo being broken into three parts? That is very interesting and I'd like to read up on it more...

5 posted on 06/10/2007 5:23:00 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus CINO-RINO GRAZIE NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley
I will hunt up the Passover ritual for you when I get home later.

As for John 6 this is another misreading. Jesus always taught in symbols and parables. That was the case in John 6

John 6 is a metaphor please read the 6th chapter of John from verse 1 until the end with me .

Jesus preformed a miracle where thousands were fed bread. He then went away from the crowd.

The crowd followed him, but not because they sought Christ as teacher or Savior, not because they knew he was the Christ, but because they wanted to get their stomachs full of bread.

Read the rebuke of Christ to them

Jhn 6:25 And when they had found him on the other side of the sea, they said unto him, Rabbi, when camest thou hither?
Jhn 6:26 Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled.

It was then He began to teach that they were looking for a miracle that would fill their stomachs ( as did the nation of Israel in the desert) and not for His presence or teaching. They only wanted their temporal needs met.

Jhn 6:27 Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.
Jhn 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

Jhn 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

Jesus laid out that salvation was by FAITH, and that Faith was a work of the Father

Then then decided to put Christ to a test ...Give us PROOF. It was THEY that brought up the manna (bread) Not Christ

Jhn 6:30 They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work?
Jhn 6:31 Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.

Jesus clarified where salvation comes from;

Jhn 6:32 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven

He was pointing out that the "bread from heaven " that kept their fathers only gave them physical life.. HE on the other hands was sent from the Father to give them eternal spiritual life.

They did not "get it" they were looking for REAL bread to give them physical life as had happened in the desert, they were looking for tangible bread like manna, justy as they were looking for an earthly savior not a divine salvation.

Jhn 6:34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.

Jesus then patiently explained to them that His flesh is life for the world.. His crucified body was what was going to bring eternal life, not a temporal one

Jhn 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
Jhn 6:36 But I said unto you,That ye also have seen me, and believe not.
Jhn 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
Jhn 6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
Jhn 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.

Jhn 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

The entire message is on salvation by faith .

The listeners did not get it , they were hung up on another point .

Jhn 6:41 The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven.
Jhn 6:42 And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?

Notice the focus of the crowd was not on Him being the BREAD or eating Him but that He said he came down from heaven ( a claim of divinity )

Jhn 6:43 Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.
Jhn 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Jhn 6:45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.
Jhn 6:47 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.

Jhn 6:48 I am that bread of life.
Jhn 6:49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
Jhn 6:50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
Jhn 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

Jesus here declares that the manna was a TYPE of Christ.. The manna gave physical life, His flesh is for the eternal life of men

Jhn 6:52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us [his] flesh to eat?
Jhn 6:53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Jhn 6:54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
Jhn 6:55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. Jhn 6:56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
Jhn 6:57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
Jhn 6:58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

Keep in mind He had already taught at some length that He that believed on Him would be saved. He has already taught that the man that is taught by the Father comes to him and are saved. So to interpret this as other than a metaphor of being saved by His soon to be broken body and his shed blood, by internalizing the fact of the atonement in faith is not a good reading and it is not the understood by the new church

This is from jamison

"Here, for the first time in this high discourse, our Lord explicitly introduces His sacrificial death--for only rationalists can doubt this not only as that which constitutes Him the Bread of life to men, but as THAT very element IN HIM WHICH POSSESSES THE LIFE-GIVING VIRTUE.--"From this time we hear no more (in this discourse) of "Bread"; this figure is dropped, and the reality takes its place" [STIER].

Jhn 6:60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard [this], said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?
Jhn 6:61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

If they were offended at that, he was saying wait until you hear the rest

Jhn 6:62 [What] and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?
Jhn 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life.
Jhn 6:64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
Jhn 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Jhn 6:66 From that [time] many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

They did not like hearing that salvation had to be given them and much like the manna in the desert, it was totally a gift of the Father. They could not do anything on their own to earn it, they only had access to it by faith ( remember the Jews could only gather enough manna for the one days meals, and for 2 days on the day before the sabbath, they had to have faith in God to provide what was necessary for their life) . The idea that salvation was all of God and not found in law keeping was blasphemy to the law oriented Jews that felt their salvation was based on their will, their law keeping etc

To make an attempt to make this a teaching on the Lords supper misses the mark. Christ was still alive and in His flesh and he was, by your reckoning , telling them to do something they could not do because the Lords Supper had not been instituted yet,it is a spiritual eating and drinking that is here spoken of, not a sacramental.

This was clearly a metaphorical teaching to Jews looking for a Physical savior like Moses, and for physical bread to meet their physical hunger. Jesus always used symbols that the Jews understood to make spiritual points.

6 posted on 06/10/2007 5:31:53 AM PDT by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
He's very explicit there in what he taught...and many of his disciples were disturbed by his teaching and left that day (cf John 6:66). If he were speaking in allegories, why would they have been disturbed?

To a Jew who didn't really believe that Jesus was Lord, it would be a perversion of Passover.

54 posted on 06/10/2007 1:29:26 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; ears_to_hear

markomalley:”He’s very explicit there in what he taught...and many of his disciples were disturbed by his teaching and left that day (cf John 6:66). If he were speaking in allegories, why would they have been disturbed?”

Obviously they did not take it allegorically (as you have not). Had they not made the same mistake you have made, perhaps they might have stayed around??

They probably would not have stayed since I agree with ears_to_hear that the true hang-up was acceptance of Christ’s divinity.


130 posted on 06/11/2007 5:17:57 AM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
He's very explicit there in what he taught...and many of his disciples were disturbed by his teaching and left that day (cf John 6:66). If he were speaking in allegories, why would they have been disturbed?

************

I would think it would be difficult to get past this point if one were to try to deny transubstantiation.

131 posted on 06/11/2007 5:29:48 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; pjr12345; ears_to_hear; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; HarleyD

“He’s very explicit there in what he taught...and many of his disciples were disturbed by his teaching and left that day (cf John 6:66).”

Now I understand your hermeneutic. So when Jesus says “this is my body” He means His real body. And when He says to Mary (John 19:26-27) that John is her son and to John that Mary is his mother and she goes home with him, Jesus is saying Mary really gave birth to John, which I’m sure came as a surprize to Salome, Mary’s cousin.


237 posted on 06/11/2007 8:56:45 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson