Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Between the Lines; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg; ears_to_hear

They are correct to suspect cases in the protestant churches and the evangelical church and other religious bodies.

One thing about lawyers that’s very biblical: they COUNT ON the depraved sinfulness of human nature. They can rest assured that some in any group will commit sexual indiscretions.


17 posted on 06/15/2007 7:08:10 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; P-Marlowe; ears_to_hear; blue-duncan; 1000 silverlings; pjr12345; fortheDeclaration; ...
Yes, all men are fallen. In truth, a married clergy precludes much of the sin that is endemic to Rome.

The RCC only wishes there were sex scandals in Protestant churches of the same magnitude that exist in the RCC.

I urge everyone, Protestant and Catholic, to rent or buy the jarring, engrossing and truthful documentary DVD, "Deliver Us From Evil."

After viewing the DVD you realize the problem is so deep and vast as to be nearly insurmountable for the RCC.

And you understand better what the difference is between sexual transgressions in the RCC and the Protestant churches. In Protestant churches the minister is seen as a fellow believer, a leader who is learned and commissioned by God to teach and guide, but who is not any closer to God than any of his flock.

OTOH the RCC teaches that the priest is actually different from other believers, significantly closer to God because he is seen as the actual and required administrator of God's grace. Protestants rightly acknowledge this responsibility as belonging to the Holy Spirit alone and not to any man on earth.

It's this elevated position of supernatural authority, coupled with an unnatural, unBiblical celibacy, that create the massive, systemic problem in the RCC which the Protestant churches simply do not have, by the grace of God.

It's the difference between law-breaking under a republican form of government with its checks and balances, compared to law-breaking under a monarchy. One is open to scrutiny as much as possible; the other is hidden and subversive by definition and the perks of the position.

"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret.

But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.

Wherefore he saith, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light." -- Ephesians 5:11-14


28 posted on 06/15/2007 10:19:09 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson