Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...

Please correct any misunderstandings I may have had. Is this now the norm for celebrating the NO Mass?


2 posted on 07/14/2007 6:30:59 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NYer

** the remaining hosts were gathered together into 2 of the silver and gold communion cups and placed in the Tabernacle.**

Doesn’t quite sound like a ciborium. Since the hosts were consecrated for the Mass and then saved for the next Mass, they are nevertheless, still consecrated. I think you know that.

Did the EMHCs consume the remaining Precious Blood and bring the chalices out to be purified by the priest? That is the correct procedure now. Our priest or deacon purifies the chalices each week. BTW, the extra chalices filled with the appropriate amount of wine are always present on the altar during the consecration of the priest’s cup, and so they also are consecrated.


33 posted on 07/14/2007 9:31:20 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson