Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Zero Sum
One more thing regarding male "seed" proponents and I will stop. Pythagoras (6th c. BC) poprosed a method of human inheirtance which inlcuded male and female contributions. While this may appear to be and advanced foreknowledge of what we know about it today, on closer crutiny it is obviously not.

Namly, Pythagoras taught that man contributes all essential characteristics whereas the woman contributed only metrial substrate [Wikipedia and a number of Internet sources].

Curiously, the idea that male sperm contained a fully formed human (just as it was believed that a seed of a tree contained a fully formed miniscule tree) was the predominant belieef until the 17th century! Some early microscopic observers reported "seeing" small humnas inside the sperm (homonculus).

By the 18th century the sides reversed and ovism became the favored theory, shifting everything to the woman, and the male was believed to simply provide the "energy" needed for growth.

It was the discovery of cell division, Mendalian genetics, and the discovery female eggs that advanced our understanding of conception and inhertance, in the 19th century and onward.

13,064 posted on 01/24/2008 4:30:07 PM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13047 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50

I thought it all had to do with birds and bees and stuff like that. Then you go out to the cabbage patch and pick a baby from under the leaves.

Personally, I think combining feathers and honey would just make a mess.


13,065 posted on 01/24/2008 4:42:51 PM PST by irishtenor (Check out my blog at http://boompa53.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13064 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson