Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Gibson builds a $37m church in the Malibu hills
Perth Now ^ | September 5, 2007 | Peta Hellard

Posted on 09/06/2007 11:50:10 AM PDT by NYer

MEL Gibson has poured a further $10 million into his controversial sect in the Malibu hills as he oversees construction of a 400-seat church to expand his flock.

A federal tax filing reveals that the troubled actor-director made the large lump sum donation earlier this year to his Holy Family Catholic Church, which is situated in the secluded Agoura Hills.

The private church now has $37 million in its coffers - up from $27 million last year, according to the tax document.

Gibson's secretive sect is not recognised by the Roman Catholic Church because it does not acknowledge the authority of the Pope or the Vatican and rejects the universally accepted teachings of the Second Vatican Council.

The church - which offers a daily morning mass in Latin - follows an antiquated ideology of Catholicism dating back to the 16th century.

Female followers of Gibson's church must abide by a strict dress code, requiring them to wear veils over their hair and long skirts, with a ban on pants for women.

The exclusive parish currently caters for about 70 families, with the existing chapel having seating for only 100 people.

However, the new church, located 400m up the hill from the current building, will seat about 400 when it is completed in the next 12 months.

Visible throughout much of the valley it overlooks, the high-ceilinged church is being constructed in the architectural style of an old-fashioned Spanish mission.

It is understood that Gibson, 51, also owns the construction company that is building his new place of worship.

Planning documents, seen by The Daily Telegraph, reveal that the current church building will become a meeting hall for the parish.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Worship
KEYWORDS: 666; catholics; divorce; malibu; melgibson; taxevasion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: BlackElk; Argus
Argus: SSPX was declared schismatic and its leaders and adherents excommunicated by John Paul II in 1988 for the consecration of bishops in direct defiance and disobedience of papal authority and orders.

False.

Only the two consecrating bishops, Lefebvre and Castro Mayer, as well as the four SSPX priests wbo were consecrated bishops, were said - by a V2 Church spokesman - to have incurred a latae sententiae excommuncation (automotatic under existing law) for consecrating a bishop without papal mandate. No juridical proceedings or the issuance or a formal decree of excommunication was declared against anyone.

Also the law had been instituted by Pope Pius XII to deal with the ChiCom false Patriotic Church, i.e imposed against false Catholics by true ones - instead of vice versa in 1988 - and to incur this penalty under the canon law it was essential that the new bishop be installed as a competing authority in a jurisdiction, i.e as an ordinary in a competing diocese to an existing Catholic one.

And of course those who hold to the true Faith and to the true Church are the real Catholics, not the apostate heretics of modernism of the false Church of Vatican 2.

John Paul II Denying Christ and Kissing the Koran

St Robert Bellarmine, "De Romano Pontifice", ("On the Roman Pontiff"), liber II, caput 30:

"Est ergo quinta opinio vera, papam haereticum manifestum per se desinere esse papam et caput, sicut per se desinit esse christianus et membrum corporis Ecclesiae; quare ab, Ecclesia posse eum judicari et puniri. Haec est sententia omnium veterum Patrum, qui docent, haereticos manifestos mox amittere omnem jurisdictionem."

"Therefore, the true opinion is the fifth, according to which the Pope who is manifestly a heretic ceases by himself to be Pope and head, in the same way as he ceases to be a Christian and a member of the body of the Church; and for this reason he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the opinion of all the ancient Fathers, who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction."

21 posted on 09/06/2007 3:26:59 PM PDT by Youngstown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal

What an absurd comment! Not all women look good in dresses, leaving them with little alternative than a tasteful pants suit. Does that, in your opinion, make them less devout?


22 posted on 09/06/2007 4:23:16 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Youngstown; BlackElk; Argus

The picture you have posted, speaks volumes about your total ignorance of the situation, and identifies your particular ‘schismatic’ faith. An apology is in order.


23 posted on 09/06/2007 4:27:56 PM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Let’s play “count the buzzwords” in this one:

controversial
secluded
private
secretive
antiquated
strict
exclusive
old-fashioned

I say string ‘im up now.

And how can a building be both “secluded” and “visible from much of the valley it overlooks” at the same time?


24 posted on 09/06/2007 4:37:46 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is not a Catholic Church accepted by the Archdiocese of LosAngeles.

Totally private church.


25 posted on 09/06/2007 4:39:18 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Christiane Amanpour said that on CNN where she was trying to equate an evangelical Christian outfit called "Teen Mania Ministries" with the murderous Taliban. See here (in the first set of block quotes).

For a few days Laura Ingraham used it amongst the soundbytes she plays over her opening theme music. LOL!!!

26 posted on 09/06/2007 5:30:59 PM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Not quite sure that line in article about him not recognising authority of the Pope. I thought Raymond Arroyo had cleared this up years ago when he interviewed him on EWTN. I can’t remember the whole interview, anyone else remember?


27 posted on 09/06/2007 6:05:59 PM PDT by Gerish (Feed your faith and your doubts will starve to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
At one time, Mel Gibson sent his son to an SSPX school.

And, at one time, Mel Gibson would go to the SSPX Church in the LA Area (Saint Michaels).

Mel's son had behavior problems and the strict school seemed to straighten him out (I think). I believe it was the school of SSPX in St. Marys, Kansas, but I am not sure...

28 posted on 09/06/2007 10:54:46 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

“I don’t think one very public DUI qualifies one for “troubled” status.”

Unlike some of the young women recently in the news, I read that Mel was meeting all the requirements of his sentence.

Assuming it was his first DUI, the sentence is not too harsh. But it escalates quite a lot, for a 2nd offense.

Either way, at the time of his incident, it was reported he had had a long time sober. I trust this wake-up situation has put him back on the sobriety path.


29 posted on 09/06/2007 11:12:05 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Youngstown
John Paul II was pope. Marcel was not. John Paul II was in communion with the Holy See. Marcel was not. John Paul II was Catholic and, once Marcel excommunicated his insolent self Marcel was not Catholic. Those who were consecrated as SSPX bishops excommunicated themselves. Those who adhere to the schism did likewise. Ecclesia Dei 1988. That you pose as a sedevacantist demonstrates the obviousness of self-excommunication. Sedevacantism is even further out than the SSPX schism. God gave Peter and his successors the keys to judge you. You have no authority to judge Peter and his successors. If your tastes are offended, tooooo baaaaad!
30 posted on 09/07/2007 12:18:11 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: topher

So, Mel is a sinner as am I and probably you too! If his chapel is either sedevacantist or SSPX schismatic we would have heard definitive proof as we have not. If Mel were a sedevacantist or an SSPX adherent and excommuncatus, The Passion of the Christ would still be a remarkable and valuable movie (just as the King James Version of the Bible is a magnificent work) and he would still be a remarkable movie artist and actor and the SSPX schism would still be a schism and its cult leaders and adherents still excommunicated. I am acquainted with some of the St. Mary’s, Kansas wingnuts and would not put my kids under their tutelage on a bet.


31 posted on 09/07/2007 12:28:39 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Hmmm, interesting prose. Were Mel a homosexual liberal, it would have read this way:
"Mel Gibson has bestowed a gift of $10 million on his progressive church in the lovely Malibu hills...."
Funny what a difference a few well-placed words can make.

So true. The bias is blatant.

Note that this Aussie newsrag also writes: :A federal tax filing reveals that the troubled actor-director....
He isn't troubled; he's doing great. The "troubled" ones are the Sleazywoodians and media who detest Gibson. All for the making of his marvelous movie about Jesus. If he had made a mockery of Jesus, he would be a hero to those same people.

32 posted on 09/07/2007 5:33:05 AM PDT by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bosco
Gibson's secretive sect is not recognised by the Roman Catholic Church because it does not acknowledge the authority of the Pope or the Vatican and rejects the universally accepted teachings of the Second Vatican Council.

Baloney.

33 posted on 09/07/2007 5:33:57 AM PDT by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
Christiane Amanpour said that on CNN where she was trying to equate an evangelical Christian outfit called "Teen Mania Ministries" with the murderous Taliban. See here (in the first set of block quotes). For a few days Laura Ingraham used it amongst the soundbytes she plays over her opening theme music. LOL!!!

Amanpour is a load of garbage.
Thank goodness for Ingraham.

34 posted on 09/07/2007 5:36:30 AM PDT by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bosco

Gibson’s an apostate, plain and simple. I pray that he comes down from the clocktower.


35 posted on 09/07/2007 6:18:29 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Youngstown

Pope John Paul II’s kissing the Koran, I will be the first to admit, was an episode of poor personal judgment. What that has to do with the infallibility of the Papal office, I wish you could clue us all in on, because it’s not applicable. If this is your measure of what makes the chair of Peter vacant, then you must hold that the seat has been vacant since the time of the fiendish Alexander VI, who “denied Christ” in such a profound way that not even the priests at St. Peter would accept his body for burial at the time of his death.

Seriously, if you don’t understand what infallibility is applied to, stop spreading your errors.


36 posted on 09/07/2007 6:27:05 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

What does canon law say about people setting up personal churches without recognition of the Vatican? I’m certainly no expert on this, but I’m guessing if one acts outside of communion with Rome, one is “outside of communion with Rome”.


37 posted on 09/07/2007 6:29:46 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
The cited language about Mel's secretive cult is balderdash. He simply has Tridentine Masses said in his own private chapel. The priest who said daily Tridentine Masses on the set of The Passion of the Christ was a retired priest in good standing from Canada.

Unfortunately, Mel's own words convict him:

"I agree with everyone who says the Vatican is a wolf in sheep's clothing."

Additionally, the following statement was made by Cardinal Mahoney - who I am no fan of, but still enjoys authority as Archbishop of Los Angeles:

"I know nothing about the Church in Malibu. It is certainly not in communion with the Universal Catholic Church nor the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. I have never met Mr. Gibson, and he does not participate in any parish of this Archdiocese. He, apparently, has chosen to live apart from the communion of the Catholic Church. I pray for him."

38 posted on 09/07/2007 7:35:21 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Exactly/


39 posted on 09/07/2007 7:36:48 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
What I had heard came from folks (relatives of mine) who are in St. Marys, Kansas, and are part of SSPX. They were the ones that told me the story.

From the account of Jim Caviezel, it was clear that the Vatican helped with The Passion of Christ, as least from Jim's perspective...

40 posted on 09/07/2007 11:59:04 AM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson