Lefebrivists demand (2nd Vatican) Council be “corrected,” not interpreted

CNA ^ | October 30, 2007

[NYer]

Rome, Oct 30, 2007 / 01:05 pm (CNA).- In an interview with Italian journalist Paolo Luigi Rodari, the author of the blog “Palazzo Apostolico,” Bernard Fellay, the superior general of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, said the schismatic movement demands not only a “correct interpretation” of Vatican II, but that the Council documents actually be changed.

Fellay defended his fellow excommunicated bishop, Ricard Williamson, identified by some in the media as leader of the “intransigent wing” of the fraternity.  Fellay said, “Williamson and I are in agreement that it would be difficult to re-enter to the Church as it currently is.”

“The reasons are simple,” Fellay said, because “Benedict XVI has liberalized the ancient rite,” yet he has been criticized “by the majority of the bishops.”  “What should we do? Re-enter the Church just to be insulted by these people?” he said.

“In addition to the ancient rite,” he continued, “the problem for us is the words Pope Benedict has dedicated to Vatican II,” because “the rupture with the past is directly related, unfortunately, to some texts of Vatican II and these texts, in some way, should be revised.”

“Ratzinger should prepare for a direct revision of the Council texts and not just denounce their incorrect hermeneutic (interpretation),” Fellay went on.  He cited as an example the declaration on religious freedom, Dignitatis Humanae.  According to Fellay, the document subjects the Church to the authority of the State. “In my opinion it should be the opposite: the State should submit to the Catholic faith and recognize that it is the religion of the State.”

Fellay said he has maintained ongoing correspondence with Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, “but no common working document exists yet.”  “I remain confident, however, because all of our contact up to this point has been excellent,” he said.

[murphE]

Fascinating choice of words, there.

Yes indeed. I wonder who chose them, French speaking Bishop Fellay speaking Italian in the original interview, the person who translated it from Italian to English, or the "journalists" of the CNA articles who seem to try to fit the words "schismatic" and "excommunicated" in as many sentences as possible in any article about the SSPX. Hmmm.

CNS is editorially independent and a financially self-sustaining division of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

[rogator]

“its adherents remain defiant, disobedient, disrespectful of papal authority, and revolutionaries against Holy Mother the Church to this day”

Sounds like you are talking about some of the “in communion” parishes at which I have attended Mass.
I can only hope that the Holy Father and the SSPX folks find a way to fix this breakdown so that the rest of the church can focus on the loss of reverence and faith that is so apparent in such a great number of our “in communion” parishes and dioceses.

[maryz]

I think there would be nothing wrong in seriously reexamining the documents and seeing if there are some clarifications that should be made.

I agree -- but considering the weeping and gnashing of teeth and general caterwauling over the MP "rolling back the reforms [sic] of Vatican II," the Anvil Chorus greeting something like that would be deafening! (Popcorn time?)