So is the validity of his claim to apostolic succession! Even apart from considering questions on this theme dating back to the 1500’s, it is clear that the Anglican episcopacy has had severe defects of “intention” for some time now. The current Arch-laic’s scorn-filled moniker as a “Druid” only underscores the point. This man is an abomination, an embarrassment to actually Christian Anglicans everywhere, and an apostate. His opinions on the Nativity of Christ, or any other Christian topic, are about as relevant to the Body of Christ as those of the Dalai Lama. Perhaps even less so, since the Dalai Lama demonstrates a working knowledge of authentic Christian principles, even if, like the AoC, he doesn’t actually believe in them!