as for the rest, it's typical Protestant dodging and weaving. For such arguers the mere fact of the attack (whatever the content) is victory, and a reply (again, whatever the content) is evidence of defeat. And a vigorous defense to a vicious unreasoning attack is evidence of an even more severe defeat.
Yo! marshmallow! did you goof, as I said, or did I, or what? Iscool here thinks that if we contradict each other on a minor matter that is proof that snake-handlers in West Virginia are right about us. That's what passes for thought in some circles.
It was not an attack...It was not vicious and it was not unreasonable...
And I was not trying to defeat anyone...You defeated yourself by trying to defend yourself...
You are taking this far more seriously than I am...