Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All Roads Lead To Rome (A Southern Baptist's Journey into the Catholic Church)
Confiteordeo ^ | John David Young

Posted on 02/19/2008 11:55:18 AM PST by NYer

I know that I was not the first Protestant to learn the truth about the Catholic Church; I am sure that this is a story you could probably hear from countless other people, changing only the names and places. I know that many have walked the road that I have; that road which leads home, to Rome!

I was born in 1975 to two God-fearing Southern Baptists in Dallas, Texas. My father had grown up Methodist, but became Baptist when he married my mother in 1968. From what my father has said, his family was mostly Methodist. His father and his paternal grandfather were both Thirty-Third Degree Masons. My father's paternal grandfather's father was even the founding pastor of the First Methodist Church of Dallas. Though I have heard the history of my father's family, I myself knew only a very few of them. A great majority of my mother's family was Baptist, with a smattering of Methodists here and there. I am fairly certain of one thing, however: there were no Catholics.

Since a very young age, I can remember going to church and Sunday school on Sunday mornings to listen to the preacher and my Sunday school teachers talk about Jesus, and how He would save us from the fires of Hell. Every Sunday morning, my parents and I would sing in church and listen to the sermons. Though we didn't usually attend the Sunday evening services, I knew that once a month on a Sunday evening, an event called The Lord's Supper would happen. At this Lord's Supper, the preacher would begin passing around large round trays made of chrome. One of the trays had tiny crackers on it, and the other one had little cups of grape juice. I can remember that before I was baptized I wanted to take part in this event, but my parents would not let me. They did not explain why I shouldn't, other than I hadn't been baptized yet. Just as it is in the Catholic Church, Baptism is an initiation of sorts into the active life of the church community. (Of course, to a Catholic, it is that and much more. I would not know this until much later.) A few years went by, and when I was about eight years old, I decided that I wanted to be "saved" and get baptized. To get "saved," you would pray a little prayer like, "Dear Jesus, please come into my heart and forgive me of all of my sins. I ask you to become my personal Lord and Savior. All these things I pray in Jesus' name. Amen." From a Baptist viewpoint, being baptized is only a symbol, and nothing more. In other words, for a Baptist, baptism isn't really necessary for salvation. After I got baptized, I was able to partake in the Lord's Supper. I asked my father what the Lord's Supper meant, and he said that it represented the body and the blood of Jesus. That is to say, it represented the sacrifice that He made for us on the Cross. My father then read the passage from a King James Bible that told about the establishment of what we called The Lord's Supper: "And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. (Luke 22:19-20, KJV)" I asked why it was that we only did this once a month, and even then at the evening service (most people went to the morning service). My father thought about it for a minute, then he said that the Catholics do it every Sunday at all of their services. (In actuality, most Catholic churches have at least one Mass every day except Good Friday; Catholics are bound to attend Mass only on Sundays and Holy Days of Obligation.) He said that perhaps we do it less often so as not to imitate them. As you can imagine, I did not understand this for what it was. The Baptists, and many other Protestant groups, were concerned that the "Lord's Supper" would become the focus of the church service rather than the sermon. Though there are some Protestant churches that have communion every Sunday, none of them place the same importance on the Eucharist that the Catholic Church does.

My father had nothing personal against Catholics; in fact, of all the people in my family, he probably liked them more than anyone else in our family did. My mother had a problem with the Catholic Church, but if you asked her why, she really couldn't tell you. She would give the same rote answers that many Protestants had been giving for centuries. "They worship the Pope, Mary, and the Saints." "They think a person can forgive their sins rather than God." She couldn't explain why she believed these things, or in the case of the last statement, she couldn't explain why a person couldn't say that your sins are forgiven. When I finally asked her why she thought a person could not forgive sins after the Bible said that Christ gave that power to the Apostles, she said she'd just rather confess directly to God. I believe that the real reason that she did not like Catholicism was because her father did not like it. I really believe that was the main reason. For some reason, my maternal grandfather (whom we have always called "Smittie") has a fairly wide streak of anti-Catholicism in him. Even as a child, I remembered him complaining every time the Pope was on television or in the newspaper. Whenever we were at a restaurant or shopping and we saw someone with a large family (four or five kids or more), he would often joke that they must be Catholic. The ironic thing about his dislike of the Church is that virtually all of his friends (excepting those from his church) since he became an adult were Catholic. I don't think that he had anything personal against individual Catholics; it was the Church that bothered him. Smittie was in England during World War II, and he found many friends there, all Catholic. He always spoke highly of them. He missed them all very much, too; all but a few of them had been killed in the war and those few survivors had died since. To this day, I do not know what makes Smittie think that the Church is somehow diabolical or at the very least, misled. I've often wondered if it had something to do with his association with Freemasonry. By the way, he is a Third Degree Mason (Master Mason), though he has not been an active Mason for many years.

Now you can see where I came from. A Southern Baptist upbringing with lots of anti-Catholic influence from just about everyone in my family and my church, with the possible exception of my father. If, when I was in high school, someone had told me that I would one day become Catholic, I would have literally laughed in his face. By the time I was fifteen, I had truly learned to have contempt for the Catholic Church. Not Catholic people, you understand, just the beliefs of and possibly the clergy of the Church. I figured that most Catholics were simply misled, and too ignorant to realize it. After all, "everyone knows" that Catholics are forbidden to read the Bible, right?! [a common Protestant myth]

I entered high school and turned fifteen at about the same time, and high school was a much bigger place than the middle school where I had attended. I decided to get involved in some of the clubs in school to make friends, and one of the clubs was called Raiders for Christ (the Raiders was the school mascot). This club was made up of mostly Protestant and "Evangelical" Christians of various denominations. In the meetings, we talked about "witnessing" to people, getting "saved," and how we should carry our Bible around as a good example to others. I decided that I would try to talk to people in classes and invite them to church with me. From some people, I got a fairly good response. Some would say they had already been "saved," and currently attended another church. Some would say that they had been "saved" and that they felt that church was not necessary because they read the Bible often anyway. I had no problem with these people. However, I ran into some that caused problems. As you can guess, these were the Catholics.

Many Catholics that I met did not know their faith very well, but they did go to Mass every Sunday. I derided them for not knowing why they believed the things that they believed. I said that it was apparent that the Catholic Church was based on blind faith and that reason was nowhere to be found. I told several people that if they did not renounce the Catholic Church and accept Christ as their "personal Lord and Savior," that they would most certainly go to Hell. I'm sure that these people did not appreciate what I was saying, and I am quite thankful that they were more charitable to me than I was to them. One particular Catholic with whom I made friends was a teacher at the school. In fact, she was one of the sponsors of an extra-curricular organization of which I was a member for three years. She knew her faith VERY well, and for that I am glad. I admit, however, it was quite frustrating at times. After all, I couldn't win a debate with her. While she did not convert me to Catholicism, she did put me on the right track. I quit harassing the Catholics so much and tried to see them as fellow Christians rather than "the enemy."

I graduated from high school, still a Baptist, though not a particularly devout one anymore. I didn't go to church very often, and I had begun to lose faith; not so much in God as in being Baptist. I felt that there were contradictions between what the Bible says and what the Baptists teach. For instance, Baptists teach that once you are "saved," you are always "saved." That is practically a dogma of the Baptist Church, as well as some other Protestant churches: "once saved, always saved." The problem here, is that there is no support in the Bible for this position. Scripture does refute this position: "Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. (1 Corinthians 10:12, KJV)" (If you notice, I quote from the King James Version of the Bible because it is the universally accepted version of the Bible in Protestant churches.) Considering that a favorite saying of the Baptists was "No creed but the Bible," you can see why I was beginning to be skeptical. Here are some more (though certainly not all) doctrinal paradoxes:

The Baptist Myth

What the (King James) Bible Says

"Alcoholic beverages are inherently bad."

"Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities. (1 Timothy 5:23, KJV)"

"So Jesus came again into Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. (John 4:46, KJV)"

"Dancing is bad."

"And David danced before the LORD with all his might; and David was girded with a linen ephod. (2 Samuel 6:14, KJV)"

"Salvation (being saved? occurs in an instant."

"Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. (Phillipians 2:12, KJV)"

"We only need Scripture, not traditions."

(This is an attack on the Catholic belief in Sacred Tradition. It is a pillar of the Protestant Reformation known as Sola Scriptura)

"Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us. (2 Thessalonians 3:6, KJV)"

"Everyone can interpret Scripture for him/herself."

(In other words, we don’t need an authoritative body like the Magisterium, or teaching office, of the Catholic Church to interpret for us.)

"Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. (2 Peter 1:20, KJV)"

"Faith alone, not works, will get you saved."

(This is one of the other main principles of the Protestant Reformation: it is called Sola Fide)

"For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. (James 2:26, KJV)"

 

The list is seemingly endless, so I’ll stop here. As you can see, many of the beliefs of both the Protestant Reformation in general as well as the Southern Baptist Convention were at odds with the Bible. And not just any Bible, but even the one that the Protestants so cherished! (Rest assured, these verses are not much different in a Catholic Bible.)

At any rate, I was nineteen years old, and attending a major public university. I was exposed to many things that I had never been around before, mostly because my parents were somewhat over-protective of me. I felt quite far from God during my first year in college. Toward the end of my freshman year, my girlfriend from high school, whom I had been dating for over three years, and I broke up. I started dating a younger Catholic girl who lived in the Dallas area. Her uncle was actually a bishop in the northeastern United States. She was not particularly devout, but at the time, it didn’t matter to me. Actually, I figured that if we ended up together it would be easy to convert her to Protestantism and away from the Catholic Church. After we had been dating for about a month, her sister was graduating from high school, so I went to see her sister’s baccalaureate Mass. I had never been to a Mass before; I had been inside a Catholic church maybe once or twice before in my whole life. When I got home that night, I cried because I thought that since she was Catholic, she would be doomed to Hell if I couldn’t help her "see the light". However, the more I thought about what I had seen, the more intrigued I became.

First of all, the Mass was not what I had been told that it was: a pagan ceremony. To those of you reading this who are Catholic, this may seem humorous, but many Protestants, especially those leaning toward "fundamentalism," seem to think that Catholics are pagans or Satan worshippers or something along those lines. I don’t know where this myth got started, but I would sure love to put it to rest. For those of you not familiar with the Mass, here is the basic structure:


TOPICS: Catholic; Ecumenism; Evangelical Christian
KEYWORDS: baptist; convert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-290 next last
To: NYer

That is one incredible book. Opened my eyes and my heart.


61 posted on 02/19/2008 4:34:51 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I hear you, thanks ... and while I have concerns about the sort of practical "omniscience" that appears to be assigned to created beings under that line of thinking, it definitely helps to answer my question ... which was, how do Catholics explain this?
62 posted on 02/19/2008 4:36:34 PM PST by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; Terabitten
I don’t know..... which one is a better shot?

LOL -- Now that's funny!!!

63 posted on 02/19/2008 4:39:48 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WileyPink; GambrillsGuy; 50mm; Elvina; ConservativeTrucker; SavannahJake; PaulZe; AKA Elena; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Don't pray for me to your gods and mary and your pope or your dead saints! In my opinion, the catholic church is of Satan and the pope is the antichrist. Tell you what, while you're at it, why not sprinkle some water on me. I sure that will do as much good as praying for me to the dead gods and people that you are praying to.
Pray for Wiley!
64 posted on 02/19/2008 4:42:08 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
To me it is like picking a President. Who cares what he thinks about the immaterial? I want to know his policy positions.

In the fox hole I want to know “Is he a good shot?” “Does he keep his head under fire?”

65 posted on 02/19/2008 4:44:44 PM PST by allmendream ("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
my question ... which was, how do Catholics explain this?

It's a reasonable question, and you've got some answers now :-). The spiritual life is a mystery in many ways, but we all have explanations that work for us, intellectually.

66 posted on 02/19/2008 4:46:38 PM PST by Tax-chick (If there's a bustle in your hedgerow, don't shoot! It might be a lemur!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NYer
After all, "everyone knows" that Catholics are forbidden to read the Bible, right?!

That certainly is a myth. My Bible is sitting on a table just beside me. California Catholic
67 posted on 02/19/2008 5:01:44 PM PST by gpapa (Kill the terrorists, protect the borders, punch the hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WileyPink

Have you ever attended a Mass?


68 posted on 02/19/2008 5:09:18 PM PST by gpapa (Kill the terrorists, protect the borders, punch the hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Campion

“Contrast this to certain persons of the Protestant fundamentalist persuasion who have previously announced on this board that Mary was not really Jesus’ mother. It is a tiny little step from there to a complete denial of the Incarnation.”

Whoa...........! I’d like to see that with my own eyes.

(Don’t got to any trouble.)


69 posted on 02/19/2008 5:11:29 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; ArrogantBustard

“They were praying for me too, Wiley. Now they just send me hate-mail.”

We still pray for you too Alex. Your bigotry sometimes causes some folks to lose their cool, but that happens when folks spew bigotry and hatred. We are supposed to turn the other cheek, but the fallen nature of man sometimes wins out.

I will note that dragging your complaints from thread to thread is a violation of the TOS for this site. You might not be aware of that, but it is a fact.


70 posted on 02/19/2008 5:19:57 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: narses

I think another “dissenter” on this thread needs to be made aware of that. I’ve been asked to refrain from communicating with him, so someone else has to do it.


71 posted on 02/19/2008 5:28:36 PM PST by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: WileyPink

Here are some more Versions of the Bible.

The Latin Vulgate (390-405).
The Douay-Rheims Version (1582-1610).
The Challoner-Rheims Version (1749-1777).
The Confraternity Version of the New Testament (1941).
The Knox Translation (1955). Only the New Testament was approved.
The Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (1965).
The Jerusalem Bible (1966).
The New American Bible (1970-1983).
The New Jerusalem Bible (1985).

Other versions of the Bible:
GREEK: Septuagint; Aquila; Theodotion; Symmachus; other versions.
VERSIONS FROM THE SEPTUAGINT: Vetus Itala or Old Latin; Egyptian or Coptic (Bohairic, Sahidic, Akhmimic, and Fayûmic, i.e. Middle Egyptian or Bashmuric); Ethiopic and Amharic (Falasha, Galla); Gothic; Georgian or Grusian; Syriac; Slavic (Old Slavonic, Russian, Ruthenian, Polish, Czech or Bohemian, Slovak, Serbian or Illyrian, Croation, Bosnian, Dalmatian); Arabic; Armenian.
VERSIONS FROM THE HEBREW: Chaldaic; Syriac (Peschitto); Arabic (Carshuni); Persian; Samaritan Pentateuch; Vulgate; other Latin versions.
HEBREW VERSIONS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT
VERSIONS FROM MIXED SOURCES: Italian; Spanish; Basque; Portuguese; French; German; Dutch and Flemish; Scandinavian (Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Icelandic); Finnish (Estonian, Laplandish); Hungarian; Celtic (Irish, Scottish, Breton or Armoric, Welsh or Cymric).
MISCELLANEOUS: Aleutian; Aniwa; Aneitumese; Battak; Benga; Bengali; Chinese; Gipsy or Romany; Hindu; Hindustani; Japanese; Javanese; Mexican; Modern Greek.

English Versions:
(1) St. Bede’s translation of John, i, 1-vi, 9; (2) interlinear glosses on the Psalms; (3) the Paris Psalter; (4) the so-called Lindisfarne Gospels; (5) the Rushworth version; (6) the West-Saxon Gospels; (7) Ælfric’s version of a number of Old-Testament books.


72 posted on 02/19/2008 5:31:20 PM PST by gpapa (Kill the terrorists, protect the borders, punch the hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

You are so welcome. I save them and post the links just so that they are available for someone to read. Others who aren’t interested, usually go their own way. LOL!


73 posted on 02/19/2008 5:32:39 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: Alex Murphy
We are all praying for you, Wiley!

They were praying for me too, Wiley. Now they just send me hate-mail.


Actually, Alex, is wasn't all that long ago that I posted: I like Alex. He posts the good, the bad, and the ugly. Ilike it because he doesn't simply post the ugly. That's a good thing.

And I still hold true to that opinion.

So please don't generalize...

75 posted on 02/19/2008 5:36:43 PM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Agree with your last sentence here. I still maintain that prayers are needed.


76 posted on 02/19/2008 5:38:41 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic


77 posted on 02/19/2008 5:39:39 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
However, in all of our debates, I have NEVER seen any of them use the type of rhetoric I see here, because if I did, I would have a very difficult time even being cordial with them on other threads.

You jumped on this wagon. Next time, don't!

You and your kind are not cordial to me now, why should this change anything?

Acts 18:9 Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:
10 For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city.

In Christ...Alone!

78 posted on 02/19/2008 5:41:06 PM PST by WileyPink ("...I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Excellent question. I wonder how people felt in the same foxhole with John F. Kennedy and numberous other Catholics.


79 posted on 02/19/2008 5:42:49 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NYer
And what is the source of this opinion?

It certainly is not from some guy in a funny looking hat!

In Christ...Alone!

80 posted on 02/19/2008 5:43:26 PM PST by WileyPink ("...I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson