“No - that is not accurate. Go back and search.”
I really don't have enough emotionally invested to bother.
Obviously, this has been bothering you a very long time.
As you have previously misinterpreted my posts herein, it wouldn't be surprising to me that you're not correctly interpreting a conversation from some time ago.
If I asked the moderator to remove the comment, it was because it was done without evidence.
And saying, “I know some folks who told me it's so,” isn't evidence. It's gossip. Low, cheap gossip.
sitetest
Apparently, you do - because you keep responding to me. But, you won't go back and search, because you know I am right.
Obviously, this has been bothering you a very long time.
No - not at all. We are all accountable for what we do and say. You know that - it is in the Bible. Right?
I also have a very good memory.
As you have previously misinterpreted my posts herein, it wouldn't be surprising to me that you're not correctly interpreting a conversation from some time ago.
Oh, believe me - I don't think I am "misinterpreting" you right now. I got it. You are against people like me, Rev Billy Graham, and all Evangelical Christians. I got that Loud and Clear sitetest.
If I asked the moderator to remove the comment, it was because it was done without evidence.
Nope. That is not what you said. Go back and find it.
Of course, a former priest who comes out in an article and says McCarrick is gay - that isn't evidence either because you want the videos. That is the only thing that will convince you.
And saying, “I know some folks who told me it's so,” isn't evidence. It's gossip. Low, cheap gossip.
Now, you sound like a Democrat.