Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

You’re right. Though I think shod technically refers to shoes or boots, not sandals.


4 posted on 04/03/2008 10:57:36 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

Take it up with St. Hubbins.


5 posted on 04/03/2008 11:00:22 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; wideawake

Actually, the expression “sandal-clad” is a legitimate if somewhat antiquated English expression. So I think “Birkenstock clad” would qualify, too.

Be that as it may, I think we really do need another Crusade (Franciscan style). Sitting around waiting for the Muslims to take us over is not an option. We have to go to them and preach the Gospel.

But we’ve got to do it the way BXVI does it, and the way St. Francis did it: No syncretism. Islam is simply wrong, and we’re showing them the Truth, which is that God is Love, and man is made in the image of God.


14 posted on 04/04/2008 11:30:05 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson