[Soliton]

And of course, there's this contradiction: -Obviously, the lack of scientific evidence for God's existance. -Dawkins would be the first to admit that science can not prove that God doesn't exist.

I see no contradiction. Could you explain it please?

[D-fendr]

Dawkins is using scientific method (along with faulty logic) to prove God doesn’t exist.

If science cannot prove A, then:
Scientific evidence cannot prove A, then:
Lack of scientific evidence to prove A proves nothing

[D-fendr]

Sorry, slipped a parallel

If science cannot prove A, then:
Scientific evidence cannot prove A, then:
Lack of scientific evidence to prove NOT A proves nothing