Posted on 05/21/2008 8:35:27 AM PDT by NYer
In recent weeks, as buzz of a coming handover at the helm of the archdiocese of New York picked up steam in the city press and church circles far beyond the "capital of the world," Cardinal Edward Egan's inner circle has held to the line that any talk of the Boss' imminent retirement was "way, way overblown."
Thirteen months past his 75th birthday, with Egan reported as saying that his occupancy of 452 Madison could continue for "some time," possibly as long as two more years, the cardinal backed up the talking point early last week by rolling out a list most estimates have placed at an unusually-high 47 clerical transfers -- precisely 10% of New York's active presbyterate, about twice the customary size of the routine spring reshuffle, and a figure described as a "record" for recent years.
Suffice it to say, the moves were even news to the personnel board... among many others. Yet while a few of the placements have been deemed "inspired" for making solid matches of priests with places that would benefit much from their particular skill-sets, word among the natives said that several of the rest -- including the reshuffling of some pastors midway through their canonical terms -- bore the distinct odor of appearing, as one cleric put it, "unjustly punitive."
After the appointees were notified in calls from 1011 last Monday and Tuesday, the message quickly spread that "pastors are being called by their replacements and finding out that they are being replaced"; to boot, the usual protocol of transferred parochial vicars going for a pre-appointment interview with their new pastors likewise seemed to be suspended. In terms of its execution, almost to a man, a number of the guys recalled the "Ides of March" -- Egan's brutta figura shake-up of St Joseph's Seminary in 2001.
In circles of every stripe, the dominant reaction -- both from those being moved and those staying in place -- has been a mix of sadness, pain, malaise and even lower morale. One veteran pastor observed that, a month removed from the renewed hope of Pope Benedict's visit to the Big Apple, the mood of the presbyterate had fallen again, this time to "the worst I've ever seen it." Among the transferred, a handful are said to have sought out canonical counsel, and reports point out a number of others -- with estimates running as high as seven -- who have either rejected or sought to appeal their moves, despite being told that they had no choice in the matter, all as another longtime player voiced the fear that "we might just lose guys over this."
The full slate not yet publicly revealed in the pages of Catholic New York, the showdown over it is but the latest public outbreak of longstanding tension between Egan and his priests, which last openly climaxed in October 2006 with the circulation of an anonymous letter among the clergy calling for a vote of no-confidence in the cardinal.
Then as now, the first body that'll face Egan is his presbyteral council; as of press, a previously scheduled Thursday meeting is still slated to take place. In the meantime, the New York Times is also said to have the story, which could run in its pages as early as tomorrow.
The first reporting on the reshuffle tumult came from Westchester Journal-News' Gary Stern:
This is a tremendously difficult story to cover, from a journalist’s point of view. I’ve spoken to quite a few priests, but no one will go “on the record” because they fear how the cardinal might react. (I should also note that most stress that they do not want to be vindictive because Egan is, after all, their bishop.)Ditto.
I know quite a few details about who is moving where and when, but can’t share them because I don’t want any priests I’ve spoken with to be identified.Ditto.
I know that some pastors have told their parishioners during the past few days that they’re leaving. In several places, people may be gearing up to protest the transfers.Ditto... and then some.
Unpleasantness abounds.Indeed... and stay tuned.
“This is 10 percent of the diocese, and that is monumental,” said one priest familiar with the transfers. “There is nothing like this before. I am a priest in one of the major dioceses of this country, and they cannot put together a fact sheet to tell us what is going on right now. I’m getting news of this through phone calls, rumors and e-mails. It is unprofessional.”
News of the moves — which started circulating among local priests over the weekend — was seen by various priests as either a much-needed shift, a settling of scores or last-minute changes before the cardinal leaves his current post. Although he is 76, one year past the mandatory age to submit for retirement, the Vatican has yet to name his successor.
Joseph Zwilling, a spokesman for the Archdiocese, said in a statement that of the 40 transfers, 10 were decided directly by the cardinal in response to “particular pastoral needs,” as provided for under personnel guidelines. He also contested the assertions of critics, saying that the 30 other transfers were “based on the recommendations of the board.” The moves go into effect July 1....
Interviews with nine priests — including several who have served in significant administrative roles under previous archbishops — revealed continued dissatisfaction with the cardinal’s management style. They said Cardinal Egan had not only disregarded the personnel board in recent years, but had also failed to provide any guidance on how to handle the transition for those priests and congregations affected by the transfers.
Many priests said that had ultimately affected morale — a precious commodity among an increasingly aging and overworked clergy.
“There are some priests who are hurting right now and are devastated,” said one priest who has been fielding calls from colleagues. “And no one is officially reaching out to them. That I emphatically know. There is no outreach right now.”
Calls to three pastors known to have been reassigned were not returned. Another declined to comment, saying he hoped to appeal the decision. Some of the pastors — who under church rules are assigned to six-year terms — were reassigned before their term was up. It is unclear how many of them have informed their congregations of the moves.
Some of the priests interviewed said several of the moves were overdue in the case of long-serving pastors or necessary to make room for newly ordained priests. Still, many priests noted that in recent years, Cardinal Egan had ended the practice of sending notices of parish openings to all clergy who might either be interested or know of someone who would be good for the job.
"No one knew it was coming," said one pastor who was reassigned. "We haven't been given a reason, and many of us are terribly confused about what's taken place. It's kind of unprecedented, really."
The pastor, like several other priests interviewed, did not want to be identified because he was concerned about retribution.
Word of the reassignments has started to spread in recent days, and some parishioners and others are planning to protest the moves. The reassignments will not become official until the affected priests receive letters from Egan.
Parishioners at St. Gregory Barbarigo Church in Garnerville have started an online petition to protest the removal of their pastor, the Rev. Robert McKeon.
"Without Father's leadership, many residents will look to leave our area and further depress our community," it reads, in part.
Parents at Kennedy Catholic High School in Somers met Sunday to plan how to fight the reassignment of the school president, the Rev. Stephen Norton, a veteran educator, to a parish in Hopewell Junction.
Norton said he appreciated the parents' support, but added that he must look at the chance to be a parish pastor as a good thing.
"This was a major surprise to me," he said. "I'm trained as an educator and have spent my adult life as a teacher. You can look at it and say, 'Why the change?' But I promised on the day I became a priest to be obedient to my bishop - the cardinal. If he needs for me to do something for the archdiocese, I'll do it. I don't think the archdiocese, especially the cardinal, sees this as anything but a positive."
Not everyone sees things that way. A common view expressed by priests, those affected by the moves and others, is that Egan is settling scores before his expected retirement. Egan reached the retirement age of 75 last year, but the pope has not yet accepted his retirement.
"What does it appear to be about?" said one pastor who is being reassigned. "Rewarding the priests he likes and punishing the priests he doesn't. It appears that way."
This pastor said several priests being reassigned in the middle of terms are looking into obtaining the services of canon lawyers to fight their transfers.
Several priests also said the archdiocese's priest personnel board, which consists of six priests elected from different regions, has requested a meeting with Egan to discuss the reassignments.
Joseph Zwilling, spokesman for the archdiocese, said in an e-mail that he did not know how many priests were being reassigned and could not comment on specific assignments.
"However, the normal reason for any assignment is to meet a pastoral need," he wrote. "If any priests have been reassigned in the middle of their term, then I am sure it was to meet a particular pastoral need."
Monsignor Harry Byrne, a retired priest living in the Bronx who often speaks his mind when other priests feel unable, said these reassignments were handled differently from those in the past, when pastors whose terms were ending could usually apply for an open parish.
"There is a certain amount of arrogance and highhandedness involved," Byrne said.
Another priest who is not directly affected but has closely followed the moves said the reassignments would be remembered for a long time.
"I have never seen morale this bad," he said. "I talked to a guy today who is absolutely broken."
Truly unfortunate. NY State needs a solid conservative minded cardinal to regroup the fallen away flock. Between Egan, Clark and Hubbard, the misery meter is in the red zone.
Is this high school named after who I think it's named after or is there an innocent explanation? If so, it says plenty about the locals. Did we run out of saints or something that we had to name a Catholic school after a family of lapsed Catholics which has done a huge amount to bring the Church into disrepute and further the cause of infanticide and abortion?
Aside from that, I can't get worked up about this article. A bunch of priests are ticked off because they're being moved. I guess when you're used to telling the bishop where you want to work, a summons to move might come as a shock.
It's not a few priests - it's 40 - that's 10 percent of the active priests in this diocese. The situation is unique - has never happened before. And now the New York Times has picked up on it.
A Sudden Transfer of 40 Priests Brings Egan Unrest From Within .
Eagan is past retirement age, has just welcomed the Holy Father to NY and received a gush of interest in his seminary, from young men considering the priesthood. It simply does not make sense that he would turn around and rock the boat.
Same kind of thing seems to be happening in Seattle.
” It simply does not make sense that he would turn around and rock the boat.”
It does if you want to destabilize the difficult elements and diminish a power base before the new cardinal comes.
Just a guess since I have no clue as to the fidelity or attitude of the priests.
So, when I hear of clergy bickering about assignments, I have to wonder if it's real or just a media spin cycle. I suspect both. But, to hear either a young Marine LT or a Catholic clergy complain so openly is nothing distressing.
Everyone hates a certain aspect of their job. Husbands complain about wives, mothers complain about their children. It's only human to complain. Thank God we only have to suffer one lifetime.
It has been a long while since New York has had a Cardinal like Eagan. He has been virtually invisible to us out here in the hitherlands. Strange.
I miss John Cardinal O’Connor.
Obedience is a bitter pill sometimes but it bears a lot of fruit.
Hopewell Junction is in the middle of nowhere. A friend of ours pastored a church there for a while. Nice country though.
Seriously. This man became archbishop and got the red hat, but essentially disappeared from view. Did someone have dirt on him?
Who can ever forget this staunch pro-life Cardinal!
The one teaching of the Church that defined his ministry was the sanctity of life…at any age and at any stage. He is best known for his stand against abortion. To him, it was simple: Abortion is murder. It is a sin. But he did more than just talk about it. He was committed to the right to life and showed his concern by wearing on the lapel of his black clerical suit a tiny red rose with its stem spelling out "l-i-f-e".
New York's Cardinal O'Connor
Do you recall Cardinal Bernard Law's homily and the reaction of the Clinton's?
See post 12. (The center of the universe where the first amoeba crawled out of the slime)
It’s safe to assume that, since the NY Times is spinning this story against Egan, that the malcontents are not being punished for their orthodoxy.
They were shamed into standing up after the standing O went on for more than a minute.
I remember Cardinal O’Connor and Cardinal Spellman. There are a lot of possible reasons for this but I doubt pure petty vindictiveness is the correct one. More likely it is cleaning house, so the new Archbishop can start off clean, or, hopefully, promoting those who will have the backbone to crack down on pseudo Catholic politickians. (I can hope, right). One thing for sure — the NY Slimes is not privvy to the magisterium.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.