Then why is it forbidden for a male, married even, to ejaculate outside the vagina? All those little sperm have a sacred (As decreed by Holy Men of the cloth) right to implant an egg. Not natural perhaps? Why then are (Married) females allowed to climax outside of the frame of intercourse?
Questions then babble from traditions of men, which lead to even more questions.
I am not saying a man has a right to force oral sex (To climax) from his wife but why is wrong if it is mutual? Again, if it’s not natural then apply it to the female as well. Hence the sperm has some “special” little favors going for it, (I.E worthy of respect) deemed too “sacred” to “abuse”.
I’m not into debating as much as my husband petronski is. However, even I know having a conversation about the RCC with an ex-catholic is sometimes not the best thing to do. I honstly can’t answer your questions. Maybe some of the RCC experts can answer.
“Hence the sperm has some “special” little favors going for it, (I.E worthy of respect) deemed too “sacred” to “abuse”.”
Monty Python is not a good theological source.
The distinction is between those sex acts that are open to life and those that are not. It has nothing to do with these ridiculous claims that Catholics believe every sperm to be “sacred.”
Sex with someone you love, and which very well may result in conception, is on a completely different plane from sterile bedroom gymnastics, and I believe those who are open to God’s will can sense it.