Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cheverus
So which is it?
But, but, but THEY are “Extra Ecclesia”!!!
If so, when did that happen and who did it happen to?
or:
I agree, issue a decree of excommunication for all of their Clergy and adherents, put them in the same boat as the “Womyn Priests” and let it sink.
So if you want them now "kicked out", you must concede they are still "in", right? More, what 'crime' have they committed that desrves the ultimate penalty?
37 posted on 06/30/2008 3:54:16 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: narses

It actually is both.

The Bishops are Excommunicated as of 1988 while the adherents are irregular, so (I concede) not technically outside the Church. With the possible exception of the Archdiocese of St. Louis.

Burke placed them either under interdict or pains of excommunication along with “A Call to Action” etc. I don’t recall which.

And in regards to the Extra Ecclesia Nulla Salus Controversy: Those were the Feenyites, and that issue came out of the 1950s and centered around the St. Benedict Center. That was reconciled in 1972 when Bishop Reilly and Fr. Schmaruk met with them.

They were not required to recant to be regularized.

A small group did break off and head North of the boarder to NH, but I believe they are SedVacantist.


39 posted on 07/01/2008 7:06:45 AM PDT by Cheverus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson