In other words I was right that these sources stated he was a member of STURP. Again, I don’t even care.
You shouldn’t waste your valuable time on chasing these citations. I was merely pointing out that I had my reasons for believing he was part of STURP. I didn’t know they had membership cards, secret handshakes and the like.
I mentioned pseudoscience, because I see pseudoscience, not because I disagree with the findings, but because the findings often arise out of supposition, violation of scientific method and lack of experimental rigor.
All the things exhibited by McCrone and Schaeferman.
McCrone said it -- I believe it -- that settles it!