Daniel L. Schutte
Composer-in-Residence - University of San Francisco,
Composer, Songwriter, Liturgist, Author
Posted on 08/21/2008 8:08:09 AM PDT by NYer
While the head-scratching and hand-wringing continues over the "Ixnay Yahweh" decision, composer Dan Schutte is talking about what led him to write "You Are Near," and reveals that he's revising it.
H/T to Catholic Sensibility.
Here's what Schutte had to say:
There certainly has been a flurry of discussion arising from the recent directive from the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. And, as is evident on your website, much of it has been centered around my song, “You Are Near.” I suppose I should receive that as a compliment.
I wrote this piece in 1970, as a very young man. I’m afraid there’s no special story behind it. I do remember beginning it while on retreat and working on it for several months before I was satisfied. When I entered the Jesuit novitiate in 1966, the Jerusalem Bible had just been published. It was the long-awaited project of some of the world’s most respected scripture scholars. The translation was modern, in the best sense of that word, and attempted to be true to the poetic character of the Biblical songs, especially the Psalms. I first learned to pray the Psalms from the Jerusalem Bible. And, like you, I turned to the JB translation in considering Biblical texts my compositions.
The JB team of translators decided to use the name “Yahweh” whenever the tetragrammaton YHWH appeared in the original Hebrew text. It was certainly not a frivolous decision on their part. It might be interesting for your bloggers to read what the Editor’s Forward in the JB says about their decision:
It is in the Psalms especially that the use of the divine name Yahweh may seem unacceptable – though indeed the still stranger form Yah is in constant use in the acclamation Hallelu-Yah (Praise Yah!). It is not without hesitation that this accurate form has been used, and no doubt those who may care to use this translation of the Psalms can substitute the traditional “the Lord”. On the other hand, this would be to lose much of the flavor and meaning of the originals.
As our communal, and my own personal, sensitivity grew in the years after the writing of “You Are Near,” we came to understand that speaking the name “Yahweh” out loud was not in keeping with our long Christian tradition, and was, in fact, offensive to Jewish sisters and brothers. So after 1973 I’ve not used the name “Yahweh” in my compositions.
I’m presently working to revise the lyric of “You Are Near.” I suppose that won’t keep people from singing it the way they have for 37 years, but I feel I need to provide an “official” revised text for use at liturgy. Of course, those who make musical decisions for worship could simply choose not to sing it. There are many beautiful, well-crafted settings of Psalm 139. But, as several of your bloggers attest, “You Are Near” is a beloved favorite of many people. I can tell you that over the years I’ve received more messages about “You Are Near” — people telling me how it helped them to pray when they couldn’t, or sustained them through particularly difficult times, or helped them in their grieving – than any other of my songs. I feel privileged and humbled to be a vehicle of music that brings people to God in this way.
Composer-in-Residence - University of San Francisco,
Composer, Songwriter, Liturgist, Author
Ping!
I wish he’d revise his crappy music out of existence.
A San Francisco Jesuit?
An interesting breed.
I have not stopped singing this song since this announcement was made.
And he could have been an actuary.
He is an insult to musicians everywhere, not just church musicians. Horrible, vapid, self-indulgent pop trash.
I’ll second that!
Now it all makes sense.
There's a definite similarity between the self-absorbed, effeminate, homosexual psyche and the limp-wristed, banal lyrics that permeate Schutte's music.
The gays have not only screwed up our seminaries, they've trashed our liturgical music, too.
Our parish has wonderful music, even if our music director has to throw a bone to the hippies in the hymn department every now and then . . . .
What parish are you in? I am in Atlanta, but we have crappy music at our parish.
Run by a take-no-prisoners old-style Irishman.
Our music director is a genius with a fondness for English Renaissance music and chant.
Okay ... so his music does not rival Palestrina; at least give him credit for drawing people to God, as is evidenced in the above article. Everything new is not necessarily bad nor is everything old, always good. You are most blessed to be in a parish that embraces magnificent traditional hymns. May you never have to relocate to Albany or Rochester ;-)
Are you and your choir director aware of the Byrd Festival? There are several interesting blog posts about this year's festival on the New Liturgical Movement.
thanks, I will. I usually rely on Masstimes.org when I’m travelling. It would be great to know where to find a reverent liturgy complete with great music.
thanks, I will. I usually rely on Masstimes.org when I’m travelling. It would be great to know where to find a reverent liturgy complete with great music.
Hopefully some of the commenters are heading to confession after their comments and I’m sure even worse thoughts they couldn’t post here. How Catholic of you all.
Seriously, Schutte's music is not bad because it's new (John Tavener, Peter Warlock (relatively speaking), and John Rutter are new), but because it's bad. Pope Benedict XVI has explained in detail why pop-style music is antithetical to worship and the liturgy. . . . and, you know, he's right! < g >
The problem with justifying bad music on the grounds that it 'gets people to church' is that it devalues, even in some cases destroys, what they experience when they get there. The Episcopal Church experimented back in the 70s with bad music 'to attract the young people' but gave it up. They may be heretics but they have excellent taste in music.
In most cases not only is the melody 'commercial' (the quality that BXVI deplores) but the words are counter to Catholic teaching.
My most sincere sympathy (as always) for your having to put up with the New York bishops . . . . and certainly there are things that you need to worry about more than the music (although your parish sounds wonderful!). But having bad music doesn't make things better, it actually makes them worse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.