Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: anniegetyourgun

That issue can’t be solved - an unborn child is both - a human beeing and a part of it’s mother. So it has a right to live and the mother has a right to have it removed.

As it concernes nature the consciousness sets in even AFTER birth so that can’t be a criteria. Ca. 44 to 48 days after ovulation nerves begin to interconnect - so somewhere there will be the point where sensing starts.

Drawing a line here would be appropriate.


4 posted on 12/04/2008 9:26:38 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Rummenigge
Since we can't be sure, I'll err on the side of life.

But when in doubt, I'll always go with God - Who has already spoken on this issue. He's always right...and we are not.

"This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live..." Deut. 30:19

9 posted on 12/04/2008 10:44:25 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Rummenigge

The mother has a right to have her child removed; it is called giving birth. She also has a duty to protect the life of the child before, during and after the “removal”.


11 posted on 12/04/2008 11:03:24 AM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson