Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This article caught my attention. Many remarks on the original site.

Making bets right now that this will be a very interesting discussion. Debating about the Ecumenical tag. Can we discuss it without slamming one another?

1 posted on 12/21/2008 6:16:19 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway; Lady In Blue; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; Catholicguy; RobbyS; markomalley; ...
Catholic Discussion Ping!

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Catholic Discussion Ping List.

2 posted on 12/21/2008 6:17:43 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Can we discuss it without slamming one another?

Liberal protestants deserved to get slammed. You don't really have any problem with slamming liberal Catholics, do you?

So let's try to keep focused on the target here, and jointly nail folks that try to hijack the thread.

3 posted on 12/21/2008 6:22:50 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

From my studies, I have concluded that the very existance of protestantism is due to this. They did not like this or that about the Catholic Church, ie, king henry and wanting an anullment, Martin Luther and his 95 Thesis, The anabaptists, Calvin, Jan Hus, etc... All removed elements ABC and from there, followers split to remove through XYZ until it no longer represented anything of the original.

We now have mega churches refusing to take a stand on any issue that is divisive (Joel Osteen) to only preaching on the one or 2 issues that they, as their own pope feel are relevant (John Hagee).

I feel comforted to know my church is the same yesterday, today, and always; steeped the the scripture and Tradition of millenia past, given to Peter by Christ. As to liberal catholics, they are self excommunicated whether they like it or not if they hold a gravely moral belief and live in opposition to the church on the issue,ie abortion, homosexuality etc. It is not rocket science, and I do not understand for the life of me why they would want to belong to a church that does not preach what they hold so sacred.

In this country especially, we are all free to believe what we choose. We do NOT have to change our beliefs or our time honored faith to accomodate the new age or their belief system. It is the ultimate oxymoron, you are not catholic if you do not believe what catholics believe. We are not obligated to change our beliefs to fit yours since you are the one who changed.

In this world of political correctness gone awry, I thank God the church is moving, albeit slowly, back to its core and correcting the misconceptions and poor catechesis stemming from Vatican 2.


5 posted on 12/21/2008 6:35:54 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

” (3) To atone, so to speak, for this weakening of doctrine, it intensifies its moral commitments.”

....Presbyterian Church(USA)is right in the forefront of this which is why the church is going down the tubes....civil rights, VietNam, nuclear disarmament, the Sandinistas, abortion rights, gun control, ordination of gays, marriage of gays, global warming...ect ect. whatever the liberal cause de jour they’ll embrace it.


6 posted on 12/21/2008 6:39:41 PM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

Liberal Christianity = ISLAM


13 posted on 12/21/2008 6:55:07 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
I am currently “In between churches”. I am a Christian, but my family is largely Methodist. Though their are some fine Methodist Churches out their, I just can't bring my self to be a member of a Church whose hierarchy supports abortion and other liberal nonsense.

I'm all for open minds and open hearts, but not to the point where we start discarding the tenants of our own religion to try and swell our ranks and to gain approval from the secularists.

This article explains perfectly why me and countless others are abandoning the “mainline” churches for churches that won't discard Christ and the Bible in order to be popular or to be “modern” (even though Christianity is supposed to be Timeless).

16 posted on 12/21/2008 7:01:41 PM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
On the one hand, they appear to have a sincere devotion to their religion. On the other, they campaign for moral and theological changes that, if carried into effect, would tend to destroy their Church.

It's called, "Doublethink", per Orwell.

19 posted on 12/21/2008 7:23:09 PM PST by Old Sarge (For the first time in my life, I am ashamed to be an American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

Ping to respond to later


40 posted on 12/21/2008 9:41:18 PM PST by Alex Murphy ( "Every country has the government it deserves" - Joseph Marie de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
For the better part of 200 years, then, liberal Protestantism has been emptying itself of Christian content. First it got rid of Christian doctrinal content; more recently it has got rid of Christian moral content. Of course the liberals will claim that they have got rid of the inessential "over-beliefs" of Christianity and have boiled the religion down to its essential content, namely love of neighbor. That this love of neighbor largely consists of tolerating and encouraging what Christianity has always counted as serious sin is a reductio ad absurdum of that claim.

"...These two world views [Christian theism vs naturalist, impersonal matter or energy shaped by impersonal chance] stand as totals in complete antithesis to each other in content and also in their natural results--including sociological and governmental results, and specifically including law.
It is not that these two world views are different only in how they understand the nature of reality and existence. They also inevitably produce totally different results. The operative word here is inevitably. It is not just that they happen to produce different results, but it is absolutely inevitable that they will bring forth different results..."
- Francis Schaeffer, A Christian Manifesto, page 2.

Who can be surprised, then, that the Protestant denominations that have been seriously infected with liberalism (the so-called "mainline churches") are rapidly declining in numbers, not just in relation to the national population generally but even in absolute numbers?

And who can be surprised that American Catholicism, many of whose members turned in a theologically liberal direction after Vatican II, is also declining? The Catholic decline, to be sure, is masked by the sloppy way in which American Catholicism counts its members. You're counted as a Catholic if you were baptized Catholic. That means that millions and millions of people are counted as Catholic who are quite indifferent, and in many cases downright hostile, to Catholicism. If, more realistically, we count as Catholic only those who continue to be somewhat serious about the religion -- for example, by going to church once a week -- we'll see that there has been a steep decline.

"...Ours is a post-Christian world in which Christianity, not only in the number of Christians but in cultural emphasis and cultural result, is no longer the consensus or ethos of our society.

Do not take this lightly! It is a horrible thing for a man like myself to look back and see my country and my culture go down the drain in my own lifetime. It is a horrible thing that sixty years ago you could move across this country and almost everyone, even non-Christians, would have known what the gospel was. A horrible thing that fifty to sixty years ago our culture was built on the Christian consensus, and now this is no longer the case..."
- Francis Schaeffer, The Great Evangelical Disaster


46 posted on 12/22/2008 7:27:29 AM PST by Alex Murphy ( "Every country has the government it deserves" - Joseph Marie de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

“Liberal” Catholics are nothing more then heretics and blasphemers.

They really should leave the church, and take their pick of the pleathera of watered down dumbed down theologies already wandering about the wasteland.


47 posted on 12/22/2008 7:29:27 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
Liberal Protestantism and Liberal Catholicism

Liberal Catholicism is Protestantism.

59 posted on 12/26/2008 7:37:22 PM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future"- Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson