Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"We Are Embarrassed" (Cardinal O'Malley on the SSPX)
WITL ^ | January 31, 2009 | Rocco Palmo

Posted on 01/31/2009 3:13:02 PM PST by NYer

Long a key voice in Catholic-Jewish relations, Cardinal Sean O'Malley OFM Cap. of Boston issued a response to the week's events late last night:
The Vatican announced this week that the Holy Father has lifted the excommunications of four bishops of the Society of St. Pius X. I was pleased with the news which shows, once again, the Holy Father’s concern for unity and reconciliation in the Church....

[The Pope's] outreach to the communities who follow these bishops is just one more manifestation of his ardent desire to bring these people (which some estimate to be as many as 1.5 million) back into the fold. We know that these are generally people who practice their faith and try to live a Christian life seriously but, unfortunately, I believe that they have been misled by their leadership.

Of course, lifting the excommunications was a first step; it does not regularize these bishops or the Society of St. Pius X, but it opens the way for a dialogue. This step was in response to a letter in which they professed their desire for full participation in the life of the Church.

It was tragic that one of the four bishops, Bishop Richard Williamson, had made outrageous statements about the Holocaust and about the September 11 attacks on the United States. It certainly raises questions as to the caliber of the leadership that the Society has. Additionally, as terrible as the comments were, it underscores the importance for the Holy Father to have increasing influence over those communities.

We are very sorry that the people in the Jewish community have been so pained and outraged by Bishop Williamson’s statements. I think the Holy Father’s statements and those of Cardinal Walter Kasper, chairman of the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews, have been very clear to dissociate the Catholic Church from those kinds of sentiments. I was pleased that the head of the Society of St. Pius X, Bishop Bernard Fellay, also repudiated the statements of Bishop Williamson.

It is very important for us to always remember the Holocaust so that such an atrocity could never take place again. I recall the words of the Holy Father this week: “May the Shoah be for everyone an admonition against oblivion, negation and reductionism, because violence against a single human being is violence against all.”
Meanwhile, the US bishops' lead ecumenists have likewise gone public:
“It has been very hurtful to our Jewish partners,” said Father James Massa, executive director of U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat of Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs. “They’ve been calling us for answers for what this means. The mood is very tense.”...

“Bishop Williamson’s disgraceful remarks ... indicate his contempt for those who oppose his advocacy of Holocaust denial,” said Rabbi Gary Greenebaum, the American Jewish Committee’s U.S. director of interreligious affairs.

“While we appreciate that Pope Benedict has again declared his support for the Jewish people and his rejection of Holocaust denial,” he continued, “we fear that the Vatican’s decision to invite (Bishop) Williamson back into the Catholic Church will give legitimacy to these outrageous lies and suggest toleration of those who perpetuate them.

“Doubtless, this will contribute to the deterioration of the excellent relations between Jews and the Catholic Church,” the rabbi said in a statement.

The entire ordeal has created a lot of confusion, Father Massa told Catholic News Service Jan. 29.

There is a difference between the lifting of excommunication and being in full communion with the Catholic Church, he said.

“Removing excommunication doesn’t mean they are fully reconciled as priests and bishops of the Catholic Church,” Father Massa said. “Like any other Catholic, they can go to Mass and receive holy Communion, but they cannot perform the sacrament themselves as fully recognized ministers of the church.”...

“In no way am I excusing (Bishop) Williamson,” Rabbi Bradley Hirschfield, president of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership, said in a Jan. 26 blog.

“But I am willing to entertain that however much pain his reinstatement might cause relative to this issue,” he said, “it may not be the only basis upon which the pope should make his decision, nor should it govern the future of church-Jewish relations, as some have already suggested/threatened it will.”

Though Jewish-Catholic relations in the U.S. may be strained at the moment, Archbishop Wilton D. Gregory of Atlanta, chairman of the USCCB’s Committee for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, said the foundation is solid and he is confident they will forge ahead with friendships intact.

“We (Catholics) are embarrassed during this episode, like when a family member has said a shameful thing,” Archbishop Gregory told CNS Jan. 30.

“We’ll have to take those steps necessary to let them know we value those (Catholic-Jewish) relationships, as well as our bond, love and unity with our Jewish counterparts,” he said, “and that we don’t in any way indent to step aside from our great tradition of friendship in this country.”

The archbishop noted he was to speak at an upcoming Jewish event in his city that he already had on his calendar, and he planned to take that opportunity to assure the Jewish community he will do whatever he can to reinforce Catholic-Jewish relations.

“That is what many bishops in America will have to do – to take that opportunity to let them know of our esteem, and strengthen our relations,” he said. “The vehicles are there. We need to use them. We need to show our Jewish friends our desire to continue to move forward.”

It is important now for the Catholic hierarchy to explain theological and canonical distinctions to their Jewish partners, and assure them of the church’s commitment to Jewish-Catholic dialogue based on Vatican II, Father Massa said.

“We are expressing our profound dissatisfaction with the egregiously offensive comments of Bishop Williamson,” he said. “It is unacceptable for a bishop who seeks to be in communion with the Catholic Church to deny the historical fact of the Shoah.”


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: judeochristian; rabbis; sspx; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: cmj328
The SSPX is a complex issue.

Twenty paragraphs are necessary to give some insight into what the Archdiocese of Boston and other Dioceses/Archdioceses face with healing the wounds.

Patience, humility and time are needed to get SSPX and the Roman Catholic Church working better together again.

One small example is that SSPX wants Archbishop Lefebre canonized a saint (or would like to promote the effort).

The problem with that is that it was a very willful act of disobiedence on this person's part that caused the schism...

It is just a complex issue...

41 posted on 02/02/2009 12:23:13 PM PST by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DeepThought42

He is exactly right on the Sound of Music: it is a sugary story of happy airheaded frivolity trumping Catholic virtues of faith and fortitude. It is inoffensive now after we have Disney Film rolling teenager softporn stories by the dozen, but at the root of it is cheap self-centered romanticism pioneered by movies like the Sound of Music.


42 posted on 02/02/2009 12:39:08 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus
?Rhw 300,000 figure is Holocaust denial. It is an attempt to say that there was no attempted genocide.
Stop excusing scum just because you agree with some of their criticisms of church liberalism. You do yourself and your cause harm.
43 posted on 02/02/2009 8:45:07 PM PST by rmlew (The loyal opposition to a regime dedicated to overthrowing the Constitution are accomplices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot
I haven't heard outrage about the 47% of CHURCHGOING Cat'licks (including many in my family) who voted for Obama.

Gotta love those solidly conservative Catholic states like Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Jersey! ;-)

Please, tend your own garden before you start casting aspersions.

44 posted on 02/02/2009 8:48:17 PM PST by Clemenza (Red is the Color of Virility, Blue is the Color of Impotence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I comment so little on Free Republic that I doubt that I have much of a cause to harm.
I would say that Bishop Williamson is an extremely frank man who does not always know when it would be prudent to be silent either because he may be in over his head or because he is going to do more harm than good. These are traits virtually never seen in a Bishop—for reasons that Bishop Williamson makes obvious, if one follows him in detail—his views depart from the societal norm not only with regards to the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust and the value of the Sound of Music, but in a great many other areas. He is on the record for so many strange things that if he held that Hitler was not attempting genocide, I expect that he would be on the record for that as well. If he is on the record that there is no genocide, bringing a relevant quotation forward would be more useful than calling him scum.
45 posted on 02/03/2009 12:38:15 AM PST by Hieronymus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

There’s been considerable outrage lately about so called liberal catholics voting for democrats. Nancy Pelosi was taken to task by numerous bishops for her idiocy.

I usually tell people if they can be a pro-choice catholic, I can be a meat eating vegetarian.

I’m not casting aspersions on any one. I’m just defending Pope Benedict from the onslaught of idiocy in the media and other liberal circles.


46 posted on 02/03/2009 4:17:07 AM PST by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Maria von Trapp was in the movie as an extra...


47 posted on 02/03/2009 5:12:09 PM PST by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ELS
I will not doubt what you are saying about other rites continuing their rites for two hundred years.

But the folks who went to India may have not had a clear understanding of all the rules of the Tridentine Rite.

It was a Papal delegation or a Vatican delegation with Apostolic Annunico. Probably just some Portuguese priests trying to re-unite Catholics who have not been in contact almost since the first century.

Think of the communication problems we have in the 20th and 21st centuries, and we have all sorts of technology to aid us.

For communication in those times, it took months for news of things to reach one end of Europe to the other.

Let alone correct news going from India to Portugal to the Vatican.

48 posted on 02/03/2009 5:17:18 PM PST by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ELS
It is my mistake that the Tridentine Rite was not in existence yet when the Portuguese came into contact with the Saint Thomas Christians of Kerelya.

Council of Trent took place in 1563.

The arrival of the Portuguese was in 1498 -- a few years after Columbus discovered America -- the West Indies, other parts of America -- on his four voyages of discovery.

A good (and much more accurate link) on the Saint Thomas Christians and the contact with the West in 1498 is the following:

Profiles of the Eastern churches: The Syro-Malabar Catholic Church (by Michael J.L. La Civita)

This is an article by:

CNEWA -- A Papal Agency for Humanitarian and Pastoral support.

This article explains the "POLITICS" of what happened...

49 posted on 02/03/2009 5:35:42 PM PST by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson