Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The WHY? of Terrorism in Islam
terrorisminislam ^ | Nov, 2008 | Dane Dahl

Posted on 02/01/2009 9:13:06 PM PST by Milagros

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2009 9:13:06 PM PST by Milagros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Milagros

1800-ask-islam

Q: Why are most terrorist attacks in the world comprised of Muslims killing Muslims?


2 posted on 02/01/2009 9:16:50 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Dissent is Patriotic. Palin 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Hmmm I’m more concerned with the WHAT as in WHAT do we drop on their heads, nuke? daisycutter? etc.


3 posted on 02/01/2009 9:23:49 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Q: Why are most terrorist attacks in the world comprised of Muslims killing Muslims?

Answer ...because they never care about their people, they only (pretend to) "care" when they can use it against the infidels.

4 posted on 02/01/2009 9:52:26 PM PST by Milagros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Milagros
After Khadija’s death, Islam was hijacked by a cartel of corrupt men, headed by Mohammed himself. New beliefs were added to the Koran, old beliefs were deleted or relegated to unimportance, and the religion was changed beyond recognition.

Islam was good, until after St. Kaw-lija died? I rather doubt it.
5 posted on 02/01/2009 11:37:48 PM PST by flowerplough (Liberalism undermined: Certain permanent moral and political truths are accessible to human reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; blam; neverdem
For your historical perusal.....

Most fits the historical Mohammad of Hillaire Belloc and Gabriel Oussani.
6 posted on 02/01/2009 11:56:23 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

thanks, bfl


7 posted on 02/02/2009 12:43:27 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

I believe there was no written Arabic at the time of Muhammad and the Kuran was first written down in Syriac. In its transposition to Arabic much was lost and much was added. Please correct me if I am wrong.


8 posted on 02/02/2009 5:20:14 AM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros; NYer; redgolum; Salvation; Petronski; kosta50; Kolokotronis; MarMema; stfassisi; ...
The first Moslems were actually part of a larger group of Jesus’ followers called the Ebionites.

comments?
9 posted on 02/02/2009 6:15:41 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros
...moderate Moslems ignore such verses because they were uttered a long time ago: when the Arabian peninsula, from whence Islam came, was a wild and savage place.

Moderate Muslims are considered apostate by the pure Islamists, and worse than Infidels.

10 posted on 02/02/2009 6:41:52 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

“The first Moslems were actually part of a larger group of Jesus’ followers called the Ebionites.

comments?”

Wouldn’t surprise me. Mohammedanism is often thought of as a particularly successful Christian heresy.


11 posted on 02/02/2009 7:23:04 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; Milagros; NYer; redgolum; Salvation; Petronski; kosta50; Kolokotronis; MarMema; ...
Milagros: The first Moslems were actually part of a larger group of Jesus’ followers called the Ebionites.

Cronos: comments?

I disagree. A group identified as Ebionites were not Muslims. Their last mention is circa 5th century, about 200 years prior to the emergence of Islam. They were Jesus followers in the Old Covenant sense, i.e. they considered Jesus a Jewish messiah, a mortal human being anointed by God (and hence "son of God," a title used for anointed Jewish kings, and the angels). The Ebionites followed strictly the Jewish Law, and represent the so-called Judaiziers whom the Ealry Church Fathers condmened as heretics.

Whether some of them later on joined Mohammad and his followers is a matter of speculation, not fact. If they did they would have had to stop observing the Law, and cease being Jewish, which they refused all along, so it's not very likely.

12 posted on 02/02/2009 1:27:40 PM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

I’ve never heard of the Ebionites, but I think the original quote says the first Moslems were part of the Ebionites, that is: a subset of them; as if to say the first Moslems came out of or from the Ebionites.

This is quite different than saying the Ebionites were Moslems.


13 posted on 02/02/2009 1:32:34 PM PST by Petronski (For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
The Ebionites (which means "The Poor Ones") were the Law-observing Christians centered around the Jerusalem Church and St. James. They were the party +Paul refers to in his narrative in Antioch. To them, the party of +Paul were the apostates of the law. The Book of Acts obviously tried to minimize the clash in the early Church, but it was serious and not at all as easily resolved as the book of Acts implies.

The probelm of "Judiaziers" continued for centuries and the Pauline Church fought them to the bitter end. For one, they denied the divinity of Jesus because it is incompatible with Judaism. Secondly, they opposed all newly invented Christian feasts. This only intensified after Jamnia (c. 90 AD), when Judaism and Christianity even officially parted ways. Their presence loomed for centuries; this is documented by homilies such as the famous set of them by +John Chrysostom.

The Church of Jerusalem was destroyed after +James was stoned to death by the Jews as a "lawbreaker." His followers, the Ebionites, continued until the crushing of the earl 2nd century Jewish revolt and exodus form Palestine.

Many believe that an Arian priest had crucial influence on Mohammad, but that could have been an Ebionite priest instead because Ebionites shared some of the Christological heresy base with Arians and Gnostics. Again, for Ebionites to become Muslims (Islam appears in the 7th century), they would have had to renounce their Judaism, and would have to stop following Jesus as their messiah, which they were not willing to do. So, I seriously doubt that some of them eventually became Muslims, because that would require renouncing Judaism and Christ as their messiah.

14 posted on 02/02/2009 2:56:31 PM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Ebionites had pretty much faded from the scene by then. There were a lot of Nestorians and others in the area.
15 posted on 02/02/2009 3:28:07 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

“There were a lot of Nestorians and others in the area.”

Yup, especially Nestorians.


16 posted on 02/02/2009 4:30:47 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

I don’t remember, but weren’ there a few scattered Arians of the non Gothic type down there? I have often thought that Islam took some from that also.


17 posted on 02/02/2009 5:28:31 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

“I don’t remember, but weren’ there a few scattered Arians of the non Gothic type down there?”

There certainly were; mostly merchants of one sort or another. There were a group if indigenous Arabians who worshipped the Theotokos as a goddess too; all sorts of weird, heretical Christian offshoots down there. Mix that with Judaism and Arab paganism and you get...Mohammedanism! In many ways, Mohammedanism and Mohammedan are the classic examples of what +John Chrysostomos meant when he wrote:

“The desire to rule is the mother of heresies.”


18 posted on 02/02/2009 5:46:32 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

Arabic existed 400 years prior to Islam. It was seldom written until the time of Muhammad, and he wrote the Koran in classical (old) Arabic, which is very different from modern Arabic.


19 posted on 02/02/2009 8:13:25 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Nestorian Christianity was big in the Gulf region (what is now the UAE, Bahrain, and Qatar). There are Nestorian monasteries on the island of Sir Bani Yas off the coast of Abu Dhabi, and before Islam, Bahrain was inhabited by Nestorian Christians.


20 posted on 02/02/2009 8:16:10 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson