Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Philo-Junius
It doesn’t. It declares that the commitment never happened if wasn’t given freely and fully, based on the Church’s understanding of those terms.

I'm curious as to what evidence one must present in order to obtain an annulment. How does one prove they (or their spouse) were never really committed to begin with unless there are clear behaviors such as adultery or abuse?

96 posted on 03/04/2009 8:15:15 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody

You posted: I’m curious as to what evidence one must present in order to obtain an annulment. How does one prove they (or their spouse) were never really committed to begin with unless there are clear behaviors such as adultery or abuse?
***

That, my friend, is a question for the Kennedys to answer. They have much experience and should have an easy answer to impart.


98 posted on 03/04/2009 8:28:35 AM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: MEGoody

All sorts of things are evidence: routine contraception, prenuptial contracts explicitly contemplating divorce under various circumstances, testimony of others as to the state of mind of the couple at the time of the wedding, evidence of duress, such as parental or family pressure, etc.

It really goes on a case-by-case basis, but it’s not just a criticism of Protestant marriage: the divorce culture has infected the Church as well, and many Catholic marriages are upon examination shown to be defective as well.


99 posted on 03/04/2009 8:31:57 AM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: MEGoody
How does one prove they (or their spouse) were never really committed to begin with unless there are clear behaviors such as adultery or abuse?

Should my former co-worker (or his wife) ever desire one, they can pull out absolute GANGS of witnesses who'll testify that there was no 'openness to life' - in fact the first priest they approached refused to marry them as they both said they had no intention of having children. I have no idea why having a church wedding even mattered to them.

102 posted on 03/04/2009 9:21:30 AM PST by nina0113 (Hugh Akston is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson