And what examples do you have for the political, or monetary motivation?
That is why there is peer-review, that process will weed out any ulterior motives.
If you do not have the evidence to back up your hypothesis then it will not make it thru the peer-review process.
Doesn't seem to work very well with global warming theories.
My first thought is, what a load of cr..!
I’ve seen that show me prof game so many times from democrats that it’s become a dead giveaway. And you know what? I don’t let democrats play silly head games with me.
It’s always the same. The dim bulbs try to show everyone, what they erroneously believe is their superior intelligence, by singling out a poster who disagrees with their point of view. Then they follow you around, ask for examples, they want you to give them articles, statistics, prof! of why you feel the way you feel, so they can try to make themselves feel superior to you.
I wont play that game. I will tell you though that I’ve seen science flip flop on so many issues over my life time that it’s a joke. But I don’t need to show you or any one else prof, or list statistics of all the examples that over the many years of my life have formed the belief system that I have.
A little piece of advice to all democrats. If you feel the need to try to prove your intelligence? Then it’s “YOU” that you are really trying to prove it to.