Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/06/2009 6:10:09 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor; metmom; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; GourmetDan; MrB; valkyry1; DaveLoneRanger; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 04/06/2009 6:12:05 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Bttt. Both Dr. Morrises are such nice men.


3 posted on 04/06/2009 6:13:03 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

dittoes from a Global Deluge adherent!


4 posted on 04/06/2009 6:13:28 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

God said it. I believe it. Thats it.


8 posted on 04/06/2009 6:29:34 PM PDT by bizdoc (Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

“it could not have been just a local flood covering the Mesopotamian River Valley, as taught by most leading evangelicals today”

What?


9 posted on 04/06/2009 6:38:52 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Since there is no globe in the Bible, how can a global flood be Biblical ?


11 posted on 04/06/2009 6:52:57 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

I’d be interested in seeing a thread, or even several, perhaps Caucus to keep distractions and argumentation to a minimum, with the many believers in the literal nature of the Bible here on FR, to discuss the various implications of current scientific thought, and just where the error(s) lie versus Biblical truth, as far as the global deluge, the age of creation, cosmological advances that would seem to indicate geocentrism, etcetera. We have an apparent wealth of in-depth knowledge here among those who are not hostile. Why not brainstorm? I’ve tossed out a few things myself, over the past six months or so, that seem to have shifted the center of gravity a bit, at least in this little corner of the web. So have many others.

Just to kick it off, I’ve been wondering just when the age of this Earth became such an all-encompassing issue for science. When did this concern first arise in a major way, and what was the putative age believed to be at that time? And, how has that belief changed over time, to the present? Dating methods in current use must have a very basic, erroneous assumption, in order for science and truth to be so far afield from one another.

Is this notion appealing? We’ve got threads here that have been active for years, so it could be quite the accumulation of thought, links to pertinent articles, that sort of thing.


12 posted on 04/06/2009 7:05:46 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
...most leading evangelicals...........in Laodecia.

There, fixed it.

33 posted on 04/07/2009 4:52:01 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts
So you are assuming a world-wide flood around 3000BC (more or less) which would have wiped out all life on land except for what was on Noah's Ark.

And the whole world's land life was repopulated from what was on the Ark.

And every species existing today was on that one Ark.

And we have no dinosaurs today because they didn't make it on the Ark.

And you make fun of "Evos"?

34 posted on 04/07/2009 6:36:16 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

Can one not believe in Noah and the great flood without having to try and prove it scientifically? Some of the animals on the ark (if not most of them) would have to walk for years to reach the ark. There is no scientific plausible way for water to be created in order to flood the earth. Floods are not new water, but simply transfers of water from one place to another. In other words, one can believe in the great flood by simply accepting that God made it all happen. Why even argue with science about whether it is possible or not?


38 posted on 04/07/2009 7:53:31 AM PDT by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson