Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: atlaw; RegulatorCountry
The discussion started off with:

Just to kick it off, I’ve been wondering just when the age of this Earth became such an all-encompassing issue for science. When did this concern first arise in a major way, and what was the putative age believed to be at that time? And, how has that belief changed over time, to the present? Dating methods in current use must have a very basic, erroneous assumption, in order for science and truth to be so far afield from one another.

The reality seems to be that it's not about finding out when the age of the Earth was first studied and estimated, but with figuring out how to make it look like it originated with Darwin.

61 posted on 04/08/2009 12:06:02 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Darwin inspired by Hutton, actually. A much younger age and cataclysmic flood was the accepted paradigm prior.


68 posted on 04/08/2009 3:37:51 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson