Both. I freely admit mine, though. Recall my original suggestion, to backtrack and plug a different set of a priori assumptions.
You never said what assumptions you wanted replaced, what assumptions you wanted to replace them with, and why.
With regard to the literal interpretation of Genesis, I see three possible assumptions that can be made before the research is done.
1. It is true.
2. It may or may not be true.
3. It is not true.
Which assumption do you think was made by the scientists and theories we've considered and on what evidence do you submit that is the case?