Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
There are other issues that play into the question....

Which means, when it comes down to brass tacks, what Tiller was doing was not murder.

108 posted on 06/09/2009 5:57:48 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe
Dear P-Marlowe,

I guess I won on the point that I addressed in that you have passed over it in silence. So, it's now established between us that one may know that abortion is murder and yet one might not kill an abortionist. That was easy!

;-)

“’There are other issues that play into the question....’

“Which means, when it comes down to brass tacks, what Tiller was doing was not murder.”

Although what Mr. Tiller was doing was murder in the moral sense, in the legal sense, you're correct. It is not legally an act of murder under the law in any state to kill an unborn child. “Murder,” as defined in the law, is not a term that the law applies to what an abortionist does. Even though it is actually murder.

That IS one of the issues that comes into play.


sitetest

110 posted on 06/09/2009 6:03:15 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson