Skip to comments.
John Nelson Darby: "Evidence from Scripture of the passing away of the present dispensation"
http://www.stempublishing.com/ ^
| fishtank
Posted on 09/01/2009 7:59:49 AM PDT by fishtank
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
1
posted on
09/01/2009 7:59:49 AM PDT
by
fishtank
To: Quix; greyfoxx39
2
posted on
09/01/2009 8:00:12 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
There is much more of the article at the link.
I had to download the article and even print it out, since I took a few days to go through the entire monograph.
3
posted on
09/01/2009 8:01:23 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: Quix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Nelson_Darby
John Nelson Darby (18 November 1800 29 April 1882) was an Anglo-Irish evangelist, and an influential figure among the original Plymouth Brethren. He is considered to be the father of modern Dispensationalism. He produced a translation of the Bible based on the Hebrew and Greek texts called The Holy Scriptures: A New Translation from the Original Languages by J. N. Darby.
4
posted on
09/01/2009 8:07:35 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
Executive summary: Get right or get left.
5
posted on
09/01/2009 8:16:40 AM PDT
by
Genoa
To: colorcountry; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; svcw; Zakeet; SkyPilot; rightazrain; ...
6
posted on
09/01/2009 8:20:38 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(RIP Ted Kennedy: "He drove the ship of state off a bridge and then left the scene to let us drown.")
To: fishtank
Clearly not the last dispensation - or there would not be a future Kingdom on Earth with Christ physically reining on the seat of David...
I’ve read a lot of Darby. Good man.
ampu
To: fishtank
If we place our trust in Christ, what does it matter what dispensation we are in? All things will happen in God’s good time, regardless of what we think we know or what we try to do to affect the timing.
8
posted on
09/01/2009 8:32:22 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: fishtank
Darby is the guy who came up with the whole “rapture” thing, by the way...
9
posted on
09/01/2009 8:42:09 AM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: fishtank
10
posted on
09/01/2009 8:43:35 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: fishtank
11
posted on
09/01/2009 8:44:29 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Genoa
INDEED.
GET RIGHT
OR GET
LEFT.
12
posted on
09/01/2009 9:15:39 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: B-Chan
WRONG.
That would be God . . .
1 Thess 4:16 . . .
13
posted on
09/01/2009 9:16:19 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Genoa
14
posted on
09/01/2009 10:20:37 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: greyfoxx39
15
posted on
09/01/2009 10:20:55 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: MEGoody
“If we place our trust in Christ, what does it matter what dispensation we are in?”
Here is a good reason: If an unbeliever picks up the Bible and starts to wonder what his Christian friend thinks of the MANY prophecy passages, it does little good for the Christian to tell the unbeliever a preterist interpretation.
Why?
Because the preterist interpretation is so common-sensically wrong, and the average reading person sees it from a mile away.
The unbeliever is then left to wonder if anything from the Bible is true at all as a result.
16
posted on
09/01/2009 10:24:10 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: B-Chan
Actually, the word “rapture” is derived from the Latin Vulgate from Jerome’s translation.
As a former Catholic, I know these things....
:-)
17
posted on
09/01/2009 10:25:22 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: Quix
Darby
18
posted on
09/01/2009 10:26:20 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: Quix
Enoch and Elijah got ‘raptured’ (taken up) as well.
19
posted on
09/01/2009 10:27:21 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
Why? Because the preterist interpretation is so common-sensically wrong, and the average reading person sees it from a mile away.
The unbeliever is then left to wonder if anything
========================
INDEED TO THE MAX.
20
posted on
09/01/2009 11:01:59 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson