“2. Rome is so destitute of the necessary substance to establish her perpetuated Petrine papacy that she must resort to such extensive attempts”
That’s hilarious. The very fact that the subject is considered at such length is PROOF of the dearth of evidence!!!
I think the point is that since there isn’t biblical evidence, there was a need to create extensive FALSE evidence - assuming the rest of the poster’s sentence is important to understanding.
Of course, Papal Supremacy is based on interpreting a partial sentence, so perhaps it isn’t surprising...