Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: blue-duncan
"The difficulties are inconsequential compared the leap of faith required by the futurist gap theory."

Inconsequential is in the eye of the beholder. To God, one day is as a thousand years; whether 40 years or however long.

If that is the rule then there is no issue with anyone's interpretation, no? Why are you so concerned with a few years here or there vs. the several thousands that have been arbitrarily inserted ala the dispensationalist gap theory? Perhaps the log-in-eye syndrome is preventing clear vision.

64 posted on 10/07/2009 8:31:15 AM PDT by topcat54 ("Don't whine to me. It's all Darby's fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54

“Why are you so concerned with a few years here or there vs. the several thousands that have been arbitrarily inserted ala the dispensationalist gap theory?”

I have no problem with anyone having their own theory and advertising it. My problem is when they keep posting polemics against my theory, then I defend it and point out the problems with theirs.

I do the same thing with defending the “gap” theory in Gen. 1:1-2.


65 posted on 10/07/2009 8:49:52 AM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson