Posted on 10/14/2009 8:47:36 AM PDT by bogusname
Wrong. ID simply points out phenomenon for which a naturalistic explanation is implausible. If John Armstrong found a slot machine on the moon, nobody would be postulating that it was formed by natural forces, all discussion would be about what intelligence force created it and put it there. The DNA molecule is far more complex than a slot machine. Yes, naturalism can explain much complexity but it has its limits.
Abiogenisis and evolution are also a Creation Story. If Dawkins would just stop using science as a basis for Ahiest evangelism then he wouldn’t put himself in the repeated pickles he gets into. Same goes for science in general, stop using science to promote the religion of Athiesm and ID will probably just go away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.