Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Kolokotronis
How does this get resolved, especially in light of the “Dictatus Papae” mentality so prevalent among large segments of the Latin laity and hierarchy, even here as we have all noted over the years?

Here is an example of the exaggerated fears that we must rid of. The popes have not really worked in the isolated monarchical style that the Orthodox fear. Even when they have made pronouncements in their own name you will find that there has been a wide consultation with the bishops beforehand. This was true, for instance, in both the modern papal declarations concerning the Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary. So while the form of these decrees may have been papal, the substance was synodal. The primacy must operate in communion with the synod, but given the modern means of communication, must this always be through a formal agency?

62 posted on 10/25/2009 1:13:55 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Petrosius

“The primacy must operate in communion with the synod,”

Indeed.

” but given the modern means of communication, must this always be through a formal agency?”

Yes, but precisely because of modern means of communication, that formal agency might meet in a virtual chamber. A synod meeting is a synod meeting, wheter in a real or virtual room...but a synod, no matter where it meets, has no authority at all to proclaim dogma. That’s what ecumenical councils are for (maybe meeting in cyberspace).


63 posted on 10/25/2009 1:27:50 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson