Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HITCHENS CONDEMNS MOTHER TERESA
Catholic League ^ | November 3, 2009 | Catholic League

Posted on 11/03/2009 12:53:51 PM PST by Irisshlass

On October 30, atheist Christopher Hitchens appeared on Dennis Miller’s Internet radio show condemning Mother Teresa, yet again. Here is one of his choice statements: “The woman was a fanatic and a fundamentalist and a fraud, and millions of people are much worse off because of her life, and it’s a shame there is no hell for your bitch to go to.”

Catholic League president Bill Donohue responded today:

I once told Hitchens that one of the real reasons he hates Mother Teresa has to do with his socialist ideology: he believes the state should care for the poor, not voluntary organizations, and he especially loathes the idea of religious ones servicing the dispossessed. Indeed, he sees in Mother Teresa the very embodiment of altruism, a virtue he cannot—with good reason—fully comprehend.

The fact of the matter is that socialism is the greatest generator of poverty known to mankind, and Mother Teresa did more to heal and rescue its victims than anyone in the modern era. This explains why she is adored by the people who knew her best—the men and women of India (she is second only to Gandhi as the nation’s most revered person).

Hitchens is positively obsessed by Mother Teresa, and that is a very telling commentary on his psyche. She is a constant reminder that reason without faith is a dark hole.

Contact Hitchens at chitch8003@aol.com


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: dbag; doosh; hater; hitchens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: mbarker12474

I remember a statement she made about the sick and dying that she “didn’t care if they uttered Christ or Allah or Hindu Deity names as long as they died with their interpreted name of God on their lips.” It was a very syncrestic statement not compatable with scripture and it put me on edge, making me wary of Theresa’s total ministry and her motives. Press writing can be very bad so I reserve some opinions regarding that statement and after 12 years or so when I read that statement I might not be quoting the statement word for word though I am sure of the accuracy of the statement.


41 posted on 11/03/2009 1:36:05 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

Hitchie (he hates being called “Hitch”) recently debated a theist at BIOLA and got his clock cleaned. His polished boarding-school British accent makes him sound far more intelligent than he actually is.


42 posted on 11/03/2009 1:36:44 PM PST by attiladhun2 (The Free World has a new leader--his name is Benjamin Netanyahu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
She never solicited money; she never went for foundation grants or government funds; she never sent out so much as a mass fundraising letter; and when people gave her money (some gave her a lot) she donated almost all of it, almost immediately, to the general fund of an organization that DOES fund hospitals, clinics, and schools around the world: the Catholic Church.

Many of Mother T's critics are perplexed or angry that she wasn't what they wanted her to be and what she never claimed to be: a medical administrator. When people gave her an (unsolicited) donation, she brushed her hands free of it as rapidly as she could.

Hitch is aghast, not because she "misused" the money, but because she literally did not keep it.

One of Hitchens' principal informants was the head of the Communist Party in Calcutta, who hated Mother T. because the publicity (which she did not seek, but which followed her after the Muggeridge documentary) focused so much on the misery in the streets.

She herself talked little about Calcutta and little about herself or her work. She didn't even recruit an army of volunteers. She told people hundreds of times, "Find your own Calcutta."

43 posted on 11/03/2009 1:38:56 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. " George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: classified

I agree and then she would SMILE at him.

Have you ever noticed that Christopher NEVER SMILES?


44 posted on 11/03/2009 1:51:58 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

He’s been married several times and has several kids, so he doesn’t appear to be gay. The rest of your comment is probably accurate.

FWIW, Hitch is one of the few leftists who have consistently supported the War on Terror, even when it was led by the evil Bush. In my book that cuts him enough slack I’ll try to ignore the more idiotic things he says.

BTW, I’m curious what the mechanism is by which MT made the lives of millions of people worse. The people she worked with were so far down it’s hard to see how it would be even possible to make their lives more difficult.


45 posted on 11/03/2009 1:56:53 PM PST by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
No, she didn't. To Hutchens, suffering is meaningless,and God is a torturer. "At the beginning of her "call within a call" [she] had been inundated with light. The Voice that she had heard spoke to her tender words of love, flooding her soul with consulations and the closer she grew to him, the more she longed for him. The light of his presence,however, was soon veiled by the darkness of his apparent answer. As intense as the consulations had been were the desolations that followed." Mother Theresa: Come be my light. (p. 335) Read the Book of Job.
46 posted on 11/03/2009 1:59:43 PM PST by RobbyS (he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Perhaps I have him confused with someone else.


47 posted on 11/03/2009 2:01:11 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Perhaps I have him confused with someone else.


48 posted on 11/03/2009 2:01:14 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

Not syncretism but an acceptance that they had found at least a part of the truth. Of course, I accept the idea of a “good pagan.”


49 posted on 11/03/2009 2:03:41 PM PST by RobbyS (he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
I think you are mistaking Mother T's intense inner suffering and lack of perceptible consolations, for lack of faith and hope. For most of her life (not just toward the end) she experienced inward anguish. She longed for, but lacked almost continuously, for many decades, a perceptible sense of inner sweetness or light. Her faith and hope consisted in this: that she held on in the dark.

It is a matter of terrible bafflement, and yet most fruitful contemplation, to think long and well of Christ our God's words on the Cross --- "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?" which, as the Gospel says, is translated, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"


Psalm 22

For the director of music. To the tune of "The Doe of the Morning." A psalm of David.


50 posted on 11/03/2009 2:27:02 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; tumblindice

Present at the creation of an urban legend.

From what’s documented in her letters and her spiritual advisor’s comments - that Mother Teresa suffered from not experiencing a sense of the presence of God - we had first the spin that she “doubted” the existence of God or the truths of the Faith, and now we have the story that she lived and died as an atheist.

Bless her heart. How does feeding starving people and comforting the dying deserve this c88p?


51 posted on 11/03/2009 2:33:09 PM PST by Tax-chick (My taxes pay Anoreth's salary or Dad's pension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; tumblindice
It's probably because so many people (both sentimental Church Ladies and mocking atheists) think faith is a warmish feeling, heartwise. A comforting sensation in the brain or blood. A sparkly vision: take up thy sparkler and follow Me.

So when those who know God report quite the opposite --- report the experience of desolation --- the conclusion drawn is that all of them-- Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, John of the Cross, Therese of Lisieux, Jesus, God Himself! --- are atheists!

How little people undertand. And I count myself, naturally, in that category, but knowing less than most.

52 posted on 11/03/2009 2:53:23 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; AliVeritas
So what did she spend it on?

According to Hitchens she opened 150 convents in her own name. Perhaps this would have been enough money to open at least one teaching hospital.

You may say that she was never a medical administrator, but certainly it is a valid criticism that Hitchens makes to point out that she allowed people under her care to suffer and die needlessly. IMHO there is nothing wrong with at least one person presenting a countervailing argument to the almost universal assumptions about her saintliness. People can combine that with other information to attempt to form the most realistic view.

It always seems to be true that highly revered people, Gandhi for instance, have at least a few dark sides to their personality and actions.

53 posted on 11/03/2009 3:21:55 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wideminded; AliVeritas
Opening 150 convents (what "in her own name" means I do not know) is in itself a good work; and many of her novices --- not all, but many --- were themselves poor: so: communities of poor women who lived exceedingly simply and prayed and shared what they had (materially and spiritually) with the absolutely destitute. And probably had tiny, tiny CO2 footprints, for what it's worth.

This is not malfeasance: it's exactly what Teresa was about, and what she said she was about.

Anybody like to add up how many teaching hospitals are supported by the Catholic Church? Which itself (the Church) was generously funded by Mother T?

It's significant, I think, that Christopher Hitchens was invited --- at the Vatican's expense, I believe---to Rome to testify against Mother Teresa, which he did at ample length. You can read it all in the records of her canonization. Think of that.

54 posted on 11/03/2009 3:57:06 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Hitchens view of the world is totally political. Do you remember the Star Trek depiction of Earth as a eutopia—one without suffering and poverty. Man had acquired a god-like mastery of the elements. People like Rodenberry—and Hitches—think this is possible. Unstated is the assumption that so much power in the hands of right-minded people will not corrupt. Of course, this is plainly a mirage.


55 posted on 11/03/2009 9:01:49 PM PST by RobbyS (he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

None of this changes the fact that Norman Borlaug did more to TRULY improve the lives of the poor than Mother Teresa and all the religious combined over the past 50 years.


56 posted on 11/03/2009 9:07:20 PM PST by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

You are comparing apples and oranges. She was not a politician who is trying to eliminate poverty Mother Theresa was not a social worker, and her nuns are taking care of people who need more care than the world is able to give them.. She was filling a need that no amount of food can provide, which is love for those whom no one else loved. She did this out of love for Him.


57 posted on 11/03/2009 9:42:13 PM PST by RobbyS (he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

Mother Theresa helped many thousands.

Hitchens helps himself and doesn’t do that well.


58 posted on 11/03/2009 11:22:03 PM PST by TASMANIANRED
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass

***The woman was a fanatic and a fundamentalist and a fraud, and millions of people are much worse off because of her life, and it’s a shame there is no hell for your bitch to go to.” ***

It’s great to have an atheist say things like this.
It shows them for what they really are and it will repulse most people who hear him.


59 posted on 11/04/2009 2:47:00 AM PST by Gamecock (A tulip, the most beautiful flower in God's garden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
People like Rodenberry—and Hitchens—think this is possible.

Excellent point.

60 posted on 11/04/2009 4:56:35 AM PST by Tax-chick (My taxes pay Anoreth's salary or Dad's pension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson