Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lutherans Denounce Israel, Just in Time for Christmas
Front Page Magazine ^ | December 24, 2009 | Mark D. Tooley

Posted on 12/24/2009 6:53:45 AM PST by rhema

Led by a Palestinian Lutheran bishop, 16 Palestinians Christians have blasted Israel in a new declaration that the 4.9 million Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) is obligingly disseminating.

“We…declare that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is a sin against God and humanity because it deprives the Palestinians of their basic human rights, bestowed by God,” asserted the “Kairos Palestine Document. “It distorts the image of God in the Israeli who has become an occupier just as it distorts this image in the Palestinian living under occupation.” Not content to criticize the Jews, the manifesto also excoriates Christians who support Israel. “We declare that any theology, seemingly based on the Bible or on faith or on history, that legitimizes the occupation, is far from Christian teachings, because it calls for violence and holy war in the name of God Almighty, subordinating God to temporary human interests, and distorting the divine image in the human beings living under both political and theological injustice.”

ELCA Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson, from his Chicago office, evidently wasted no time hailing the new appeal, though it simply rehashed traditional Palestinian complaints against Israel, Christian or not. “The ELCA has received with somber, yet hopeful hearts this authentic word from our brothers and sisters in the Palestinian Christian community,” Hanson rejoiced. “Their perspective on the current conflict between Israel and the Palestinians warrants our respect and attentiveness.” Hanson pledged that we “join these leaders in their search for signs of hope and positive responses in the midst of a dire and seemingly intractable situation.”

The Kairos Palestine Document cited a litany of unpleasant “realities” for Palestinians, for which Israel (backed by Christian allies in the U.S.) is evidently exclusively at fault, beginning with the assertion that “the reality is one of Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, deprivation of our freedom and all that results from this situation.” The international Religious Left often likes to speak of “kairos” moments as specially historic times when Liberation Theology is ostensibly more relevant than ever. Deprived of the pleasure of bashing the old Latin right-wing military dictatorships of past decades, or old Apartheid South Africa, Israel remains virtually the only nation, besides the U.S., that the Religious Left still anathematizes with special relish.

Christians barely comprise one percent of Palestinians any more, thanks to low birth rates and mass immigration. But the few remaining Christians are often convenient props for the international Religious Left’s ongoing campaign against Israel. And many Palestinian Christian representatives, as a besieged minority, have always felt obliged to burnish their nationalist credentials by condemning Israel as loudly as any Muslim Palestinian. Declarations against Israel like the Kairos document also useful excite attention and support from Western Oldline Protestant elites, who otherwise are uninterested in the plight of Christian minorities struggling to survive within Islam.

This Palestine Kairos manifesto is apparently an outgrowth of the Swiss-based World Council of Churches Palestine Israel Ecumenical Forum (PIEF). According to the ELCA news service, PIEF is an “advocacy” initiative to “help Palestinian Christians strengthen their presence in the Holy Land and mobilize churches around the world for peace with justice in the Middle East.” In other words, PIEF is enlisting Palestinian Christians to publicly condemn Israel for the benefit of Western, and especially American ears, with hopes of minimizing U.S. support for Israel.

Lutheran bishop Munib Younan of Jerusalem was apparently more than happy to help out with the anti-Israel campaign by helping to organize the Palestine Kairos blast, which is predictably modeled on a similar condemnation by theologians in 1985 of racist South Africa, with which the international Religious Left always compares Israel. ”Our Kairos document is an expression of the aspirations of Palestinian Christians inspired by our common spiritual heritage,” Bishop Younan helpfully explained to the ELCA news service. Naturally, these aspirations do not include any concerns about Hamas or radical Islam, which apparently is treating Palestinian Christians just find and do not excite any worry at all.

Since radical Islam supposedly poses no threat to Christians, the Palestine Kairos Document describes the true dangers to Palestinian Christians: Israel’s “separation wall,” which ostensibly turns Palestinian villages into “prisons,” the “daily humiliation” of military checkpoints, “Israeli disregard” for international law, and Israeli “discrimination” against Arabs within Israel itself. Israeli settlements “ravage” Palestinian land. And Palestinians prisoners “languish” in Israeli jails for seemingly no reason. It also complains about Palestinian refugees, who have patiently been “waiting for their right of return, generation after generation.” Israel’s security measures against Palestinian terror are unneeded, they professed, because “if there were no occupation, there would be no resistance, no fear, no insecurity.” Of course, what exactly is “occupied?” Just the West Bank and Gaza, or is all of Israel an unjust “occupation” begging liberation? The manifesto revealingly does not explain. But it provides a hint by describing Israel’s founding as a “Nakba” i.e. “catastrophe” that Palestinians will never forget.

Naturally, these Palestinian Christian spokespersons want “economic sanctions and boycott” against Israel, and “everything produced by the occupation,” despite largely failed attempts by some left-leaning church elites to divest from firms doing business with Israel. And they pledged that “Christian love invites us to resist” the ”evil” and “sin” that is the Israeli occupation. “Resistance is a right and a duty for the Christian,” they insisted. “We do not resist with death but rather through respect of life,” they asserted, evidently pointing to civil disobedience. More mercurially, they added: “We respect and have a high esteem for all those who have given their life for our nation.” To whom did they refer? Suicide bombers? Rock throwing youth? Hamas militia?

“The roots of ‘terrorism’ are in the human injustice committed and in the evil of the occupation,” the Palestinian Christians inevitably declared, of course forgetting that Palestinian terrorism began well before any Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Or maybe they did not forget, since they never defined what exactly is “occupied.” And of course, they want “repentance” by “fundamentalist” Christians primarily in America who have purportedly turned God’s Word into a “weapon with which to slay the oppressed” while offering a “theological cover-up for the injustice we suffer.”

This Palestine Kairos Document not so covertly portrays Israel itself as an illegitimate nation that must be dissolved in favor of a Palestinian alternative. In such an unlikely eventuality, Christians likely would not be very welcome in a newly “liberated” Palestine. And the international Religious Left of course would have no interest in the plight of Palestinian Christians struggling to survive under unrestrained Islamic rule. Brandishing such a proposal is evidently some Lutherans’ way of wishing “merry Christmas” to the land where Christ was born.


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: antisemitism; apostasy; elca; israel; lutheran; lutherans

1 posted on 12/24/2009 6:53:46 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman; Caleb1411
This Palestine Kairos Document not so covertly portrays Israel itself as an illegitimate nation that must be dissolved in favor of a Palestinian alternative. In such an unlikely eventuality, Christians likely would not be very welcome in a newly “liberated” Palestine. And the international Religious Left of course would have no interest in the plight of Palestinian Christians struggling to survive under unrestrained Islamic rule. Brandishing such a proposal is evidently some Lutherans’ way of wishing “merry Christmas” to the land where Christ was born.
2 posted on 12/24/2009 6:54:40 AM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Lutherans are a small group that are losing their membership in droves. They aren’t newsworthy. Only the liberal gay MSM cares what they do.


3 posted on 12/24/2009 6:56:17 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: rhema

Many Nazis were Lutherans. The Lutheran church has a long history of anti-Semitism - all the way back to Martin Luther himself.


5 posted on 12/24/2009 7:00:12 AM PST by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Isn’t that the same G-d who gave the land to the people of Israel in the first place?


6 posted on 12/24/2009 7:00:25 AM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
I like this part:

“We declare that any theology, seemingly based on the Bible or on faith or on history, that legitimizes the occupation, is far from Christian teachings, because it calls for violence and holy war in the name of God Almighty, subordinating God to temporary human interests, and distorting the divine image in the human beings living under both political and theological injustice.”

A statement which is immediately preceded, and without irony, by this:

“We…declare that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is a sin against God and humanity because it deprives the Palestinians of their basic human rights, bestowed by God,”

7 posted on 12/24/2009 7:03:34 AM PST by americanophile (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Hitler was a Catholic.


8 posted on 12/24/2009 7:05:07 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("The Community Organizer better stop bitching that the community is organizing." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I’ll bet Martin Luther wouldn’t approve of this declaration.


9 posted on 12/24/2009 7:05:36 AM PST by DesertSapper (God, Family, Country . . . . . . . . . . and dead terrorists!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The ELCA is disgusting. I left them a few years ago and have not looked back. Hoping that sanity will retake the Lutheran Church. Currently there are a bunch of homo sympathizers, pali symapthizers, and socialists “guiding the flock” and people are leaving in droves.


10 posted on 12/24/2009 7:08:03 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie; Aeronaut; aliquando; AlternateViewpoint; AnalogReigns; Archie Bunker on steroids; ...


Lutheran (EL C S*A) Ping!

* as of August 19, AD 2009, a liberal protestant SECT, not part of the holy, catholic and apostolic CHURCH.

Marantha--Come, Lord Jesus!

11 posted on 12/24/2009 7:10:02 AM PST by lightman (Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Well, I have two words for each of the 4.9 million Evangelical Lutherans in America; and they're not Merry Christmas.

ML/NJ

12 posted on 12/24/2009 7:10:33 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Luther was originally viewed favorably by the Jewish community (as opposed to the Vatican), because he was accepting of Jewish traditions. The road parted when it became apparent that his “acceptance” was a prelude to converting Jews to Lutheranism....

hh


13 posted on 12/24/2009 7:12:52 AM PST by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Hitler was a Catholic.

An accident of geography. Austria and southern Germany (particularly Bavaria) were primarily Catholic. Northern Germany was primarily Lutheran.

14 posted on 12/24/2009 7:15:04 AM PST by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rhema

ELCA, not Missouri Synod. They give us a bad name.


15 posted on 12/24/2009 7:18:30 AM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

These churches, once infected with liberals, rarely revert to Christianity.


16 posted on 12/24/2009 7:19:39 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Hitler was a Catholic.

So the story goes. In actuality, Hitler rejected the Catholic faith in his youth.

17 posted on 12/24/2009 7:19:48 AM PST by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
I left the Lutheran church years ago as well. I don't belong to any organized manmade religion that were created by man, run by man, so they're imperfect in their own ways. Some have lost the real meaning of Our Savior, others waste time writing preaching sermons that may as well be op-eds in the New York Times while still others preach that if you don't buy their videos, God isn't going to straighten out your marriage or your finances. They're all charlatans, perverts, and liberals.
18 posted on 12/24/2009 7:21:46 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("The Community Organizer better stop bitching that the community is organizing." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

Communist Goals 1963

27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

http://archive.glennbeck.com/news/03212002.shtml


19 posted on 12/24/2009 7:23:39 AM PST by Josh Painter ("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki re: Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rhema

What’s a Palestinian?


20 posted on 12/24/2009 7:28:45 AM PST by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Lutheran lesson for all of you ignorant people.

There are three major organizations in the US that call themselves Lutheran

ELCA (Evangelical Lutheran Church of America): A liberal anti-God, anti-American, leftist organization that is led by a group of light in the loafers libs that put their own desires before scriptures.

LCMS(Lutheran Church Missouri Synod): Conservative and rooted in the basics of scripture. Women can’t be preachers or lead the churchc.

WELS (Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod): A group that is politically to the right of Rush Limbaugh. So conservative that women are not allowed to vote or serve. They did loosen up a few years ago; women can now pass the plate during tithing.


21 posted on 12/24/2009 7:33:28 AM PST by american_ranger (Never ever use DirecTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

You speak truth about the ELCA. On Good Friday in ‘08 (During O’Bozo’s campaign) I unknowingly attended an ELCA church as I was out of town. I thought since it was a Lutheran Church it should be reasonably similar to mine (Missouri Synod). I almost walked out of this steaming pile of craps sermon. Jesus’ suffering was compared to O’Bozo’s persecution by the media because of his association with the upstanding Jerimiah Wright. I kid you not. I never felt this dirty for attending a church service.


22 posted on 12/24/2009 7:35:16 AM PST by mund1011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rhema

To all my fellow Freepers

Please note this is the crazy ELCA again. There are many conservative Lutheran synods that are not a part of this crazyness, and are some of the most conservative Christians you will ever meet. I wish this group of apostates would stop calling themselves Lutheran.


23 posted on 12/24/2009 7:40:02 AM PST by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The Palestinians HAVE a State. It’s called JORDAN.

The ONLY Reason they want another State is to destroy Israel.

I was Missouri Synod for 28 years of my life, wandered around some, and then “returned to Rome” the Church Luther left.


24 posted on 12/24/2009 7:40:38 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (Abortion-Euthanasia kills the very people for whom Social Justice is needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Sprinkling water on the head of a baby makes him neither Catholic nor Christian.

Only when a person, of his own free will, accepts Christ Jesus as his Lord and Savior does that person become a Christian.

Scripture tells us that those who hate are not real Christians.

1 John 3:

Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. He who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous.

He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.

No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.

This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother.

- JP
25 posted on 12/24/2009 7:45:26 AM PST by Josh Painter ("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki re: Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mund1011
On Good Friday in ‘08 (During O’Bozo’s campaign) I unknowingly attended an ELCA church as I was out of town.

Did they use the litany that said something like, "We pray for those who call upon you by other names?" I about hit the roof over that. I am LCMS now.

26 posted on 12/24/2009 7:51:32 AM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Absolutely sickening. This is another reason why I didn’t stick around. Mark Hanson, and his recent ilk, have truly led this denomination off the cliff.


27 posted on 12/24/2009 7:57:48 AM PST by SoDak (bitter clinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mund1011

You should have given them a “Joe Wilson” shout out. “YOU LIE”


28 posted on 12/24/2009 7:59:13 AM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rhema
If the Lutherans feel this way about the Jews, perhaps the Lutheran Church would support the canonization efforts of Pius XII. This would mitigate the untoward consequences fashioned by Martin Luther and his successors.The Lutherans could remind the Jews that Germany is and was primarily Lutheran, especially the Prussian sector, which historically controlled the military might of Germany. Without the strong Lutheran north, Germany would not have been able to start two world wars in the last century. .
29 posted on 12/24/2009 7:59:18 AM PST by bronx2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

WTF is wrong with these people? No wonder the old line churches are disintegrating.


30 posted on 12/24/2009 8:03:49 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from The Right Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronx2
Without the strong Lutheran north, Germany would not have been able to start two world wars in the last century. .

Therefore, Luther started WWII. I get it now, idiot.

31 posted on 12/24/2009 8:12:23 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xone
That is correct. The Prussians,descendants of the reformers, were the only ones with the requisite intellectual ability to lead the Germans. Thus the spirit of the glorious reformers infused their progeny to challenge the other European nations.
32 posted on 12/24/2009 8:34:28 AM PST by bronx2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bronx2; xone

I think it is probably more accuate to say that Lutheranism was based on German culture, i.e. the bible in German, liturgy in German rather than Latin and ultimately the rejection of the Bishop of Rome and the Primacy of the Church of Rome which has been part of the Church’s traditiion going back to the end of the 1st century [St. Clement’s Letter to the Church in Corinth, St. Ignatious of Antioch’s letter in 107 AD, the Bishop of ROme excommunicating the heretic Marcion over the debate of what was canonical scripture, St. Ireneaus of Lyon in 170 AD and Canon 6 of the Council of Nicea, which also gave a secondary primacy to Antioch and Alexandria].

Thus the breakdown of Catholicity and Catholicism ultimately lead to Protestant Churches being tied to the Nation State [Church of England/Anglicanism in England, Lutheranism in Germany, Reformed Protestant in the North Holland and Scotland, etc, etc,]. Thus, what Hitler admired in Luther was his sense of German nationalism, and ultimately as securarlism and rationalism and the elevation of the individual’s conscience to arbitrate what is right or wrong apart from tradition, is what allowed ideologies that elevated the Nation State [Nazism] or Class Struggle [Communism] to become in essence the “Religion to be believed” and a rejection of the “continuity of Tradition” down through the centuries which brings one back to Rome and the Catholic Church, which has to be rejected.

So, Luther did not cause WWII, but the sense of Nationalism that seemed to coincide with Protestantism was the beginning of what lead to Indiviudalism and rationalism which were also the foundations for the miltant secularist ideologies that we saw in the last century.


33 posted on 12/24/2009 9:50:11 AM PST by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I see Bishop Hanson is serving “his” fathers purpose again.

Jesus would tell him he belongs to the one he serves.
His father is the Devil.


34 posted on 12/24/2009 10:49:33 AM PST by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

And I suspect that some Nazis came from Roman Catholic families, as did people in every sector of the German nation, whether civil or military. However, we do not know how many Nazis, or servants of the German National Socialist Party in general, were believing and practicing (i.e., worshipping) members of whatever denomination or sect to which they had familial connections. We must try to avoid non-sequiturs.
I would not presume to speak for the Lutherans of WWII era Germany, but as a lifelong (eight decades) American and Lutheran, I will assert that I do not know any Lutherans that are or were, as a group, pro-Nazi or anti-Jewish, although it would not surprise me if a few shared the odd anti-Jew attitudes of many Americans, of various and sundry religious beliefs.
To lump all Lutherans together in terms of political or social attitudes is to paint with a very, very wide brush.
Martin Luther’s regrettable (even ultimately, I would suspect, to himself) condemnations of Jews were rather narrowly focussed in the area of religious/spiritual concerns. That God’s “chosen people” would reject the Messiah, whom Luther believed to manifest the fulfillment of God’s plan for man’s salvation, must have seemed incomprehensible to him, being an expression of the one unforgivable sin, rejection of the Holy Spirit where it should least have been expected.


35 posted on 12/24/2009 1:54:44 PM PST by Elsiejay (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reg45

And many Nazis were Catholics. Anti-Semitism was part of “Christian” Germany and Europe before Luther’s time. Look at how Spain treated it’s Jews, for example.


36 posted on 12/24/2009 5:17:52 PM PST by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

The ELCA does not have 4.9 million members anymore. It is only 4.6 million.


37 posted on 12/25/2009 12:02:22 AM PST by MarilynBr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

Missouri Synod bump


38 posted on 12/25/2009 11:47:09 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
We...declare that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land is a sin against God and humanity because it deprives the Palestinians of their basic human rights, bestowed by God" ...Not content to criticize the Jews, the manifesto also excoriates Christians who support Israel.

39 posted on 12/27/2009 4:40:10 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson