Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; Judith Anne; wagglebee; MarkBsnr; markomalley; Petronski; stfassisi; Mad Dawg

That would be funny if it wasn’t so true. On our latest 5000+ thread, I got so fed up of the “you drink goat blood” argument and random photographs that I posted the reverse, idiotic argument. And the thread has degenerated into comedy central. We should have a forum where we can respectfully debate a central point with a group of Protestants — say the idea of the Baptists with their emphasis on adult baptism. I do believe we can have a serious, respectful debate with them on that, but for a gameload of doctoring, quizzical posters (Bashem, Hashem, Trachem) who destroy any meaningful debate with a nonsensical or out of context post or link or picture.


15 posted on 01/21/2010 9:50:47 PM PST by Cronos (Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

Threads degenerate because there is no mechanism to keep then healthy. The Caucus mechanism merely excludes controversy. There should be a way to foster controversy, yet do justice to the sincere debaters.


16 posted on 01/21/2010 10:44:44 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos; annalex; Judith Anne; wagglebee; MarkBsnr; Petronski; stfassisi; Mad Dawg
On our latest 5000+ thread, I got so fed up of the “you drink goat blood” argument and random photographs that I posted the reverse, idiotic argument. And the thread has degenerated into comedy central. We should have a forum where we can respectfully debate a central point with a group of Protestants — say the idea of the Baptists with their emphasis on adult baptism. I do believe we can have a serious, respectful debate with them on that, but for a gameload of doctoring, quizzical posters (Bashem, Hashem, Trachem) who destroy any meaningful debate with a nonsensical or out of context post or link or picture.

Agreed. Even *SOME* of the detractors are capable of some serious thought...if they are forced to stay on topic, that would be helpful.

But I think the *pat* answer would be "that's what the Ecumenic label is for"

17 posted on 01/22/2010 2:11:50 AM PST by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson