[Antoninus]

1) I do not condone pornography, but I do condone freedom. Therefore I do not support laws against pornography.

Non sequitur. Using that logic, this statement is also possible:

"I do not condone child pornography, but I do condone freedom. Therefore, I do not support laws against child pornography."

[Michael Barnes]

I’m pretty sure autumnraine was talking about consenting adults, not children.

[autumnraine]

That is so not even the same, I don’t know how you could possibly think so. Condoning freedom is NOT condoning child abuse. Talk about non-sequitor!

[calex59]

Non sequitur. Using that logic, this statement is also possible: "I do not condone child pornography, but I do condone freedom. Therefore, I do not support laws against child pornography."

Sorry, you are wrong. Adults engaging in porn hurts no innocent participants(unless they are kidnapped and forced to participate), children, OTH, are hurt when used in Child porn, both mentally and physically. Porn between adults is nothing more than sex. Filming people having sex.

While I don't watch porn(did in my youth till I figured out the real thing is much, much better)I would not support any law against Adult porn. The people who engage in it do so willingly and there are already laws against kidnapping and forcing people against their will.

People who rail against porn are moralistic and want everyone to follow their idea of what is right and correct, much in the manner of liberals and progressives.