Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

The point I was making is that there is a tendency for certain of the science intellgentsia to jump onto some type of scientific observation and then declare...”aha God doesn’t exist..take that you small minded bible thumping bigot”. Certain skeptics, or scientist wannabe’s write books or have “debates” pushing the latest fads in atheistic
thought using info that is rapidly being discredited as shoddy or incomplete.

Real scientists employing the real scientific method and employing logic correctly could never make a claim that God exists or God doesn’t exist. Since such claims could never be falsified or tested true or false, they there-fore lie outside the realm of true scientific inquiry. The scientist, philosopher, or atheistic “debunker” that make such claims do so no out of logic but out of biased presupposition. The scientific method can never be used to support the claims of the atheist skeptic!


52 posted on 02/17/2010 11:21:37 AM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: mdmathis6

So to put it another way, science is about raising more questions, not about confirming beliefs.


53 posted on 02/18/2010 4:21:27 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (AyersKKKByrdFALNpardonsBpantherNightsticks.AmyBishopDelahuntDNCisTerrorismParty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson