I think I pointed out that should God have presented himself that he would have then been open game to such scientific scrutiny. Until he does, God and things supernatural can’t be dealt with thru science and assumptions of God’s nonexistence are not supportable under the scientific method. An individual may decide that for any variety of reasons God doesn’t exist, but that is a biased point of faith or “antifaith” for that individual. A scientist working ethically thru the scientific method could never make such claims!
“A scientist working ethically thru the scientific method could never make such claims!”
Not scientifically anyway. =]
FRiend, I think we see eye-to-eye on quite a bit. Science has been so politicized that apparently even scientists are forgetting the basics.