Skip to comments.
Are Books of Scripture Missing from the Bible? (Ecumenical)
FAIRLDS ^
Posted on 02/19/2010 7:42:49 AM PST by restornu
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-391 last
To: Godzilla
381
posted on
02/28/2010 7:07:01 AM PST
by
TheDon
To: MHGinTN
382
posted on
02/28/2010 7:07:31 AM PST
by
TheDon
To: reaganaut
I was asking what you personally believe. As you have already made abundantly clear, you believe you know better what I believe than I do. So I ask again, why do keep asking what I personally believe? Don't you already know?
383
posted on
02/28/2010 7:09:26 AM PST
by
TheDon
To: TheDon; Godzilla; MHGinTN
By your non answer to my question asked SEVERAL TIMES, you have confirmed to me that yes, I do already know and that you agree with the ‘party line’ of the LDS that the Bible is corrupted and errant in matters of faith and doctrine.
thank you.
384
posted on
02/28/2010 11:55:10 AM PST
by
reaganaut
( "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: reaganaut
"I do already know and that you agree with the ‘party line’ of the LDS that the Bible is corrupted and errant in matters of faith and doctrine." It's good to know that you know, better than I do, what I believe.....
385
posted on
02/28/2010 3:14:38 PM PST
by
TheDon
To: TheDon
Apparently one of us at least knows what you believe, and I can articulate it at least.
386
posted on
02/28/2010 3:41:20 PM PST
by
reaganaut
( "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
To: reaganaut
That’s what you believe anyway..... ;-)
387
posted on
02/28/2010 9:12:05 PM PST
by
TheDon
To: TheDon
you believe
Reading the mind of another Freeper is a form of "making it personal."
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
To: Religion Moderator
Actually, I was referring to reaganaut who has been doing that for quite a few posts. I, on the other hand, have not.
389
posted on
02/28/2010 10:38:53 PM PST
by
TheDon
To: restornu; Jeremiah Jr; null and void; Diego1618; Armageddon; 444Flyer; sheik yerbouty
Matthew's reference to a prophecy that Jesus would be a Nazarene (2:23) is interesting when it is considered that our present Old Testament seems to have no such statement. There is a possibility, however, that Matthew alluded to Isaiah 11:1, which prophesies of the Messiah as a Branch from the root of Jesse, the father of David. The Hebrew word for branch in this case is netzer, the source word of Nazarene and Nazareth. Then again...
Joseph the Antecedent; Joseph the Nazir
390
posted on
03/01/2010 3:27:47 AM PST
by
Ezekiel
(The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
To: Ezekiel
There are references to Nazerit in Numbers, Judges and Amos..
391
posted on
03/01/2010 12:04:02 PM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-391 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson