That means NO ANTAGONISM AT ALL is allowed on this thread.
When does honest disagreement become antagonism?
The poster asks a question. Those who don’t want answers should not ask questions.
From the Random House Dictionary:
Antagonism: 1. Active hostility or opposition. 2. an opposing force or tendency.
Related verb:
Antagonize: to provoke or incur the hostility of.
I don't know how you can look at the original article and not call it antagonistic. It seems to be a clear shot across the bow of those who hold to inerrancy and sufficiency of the Bible.
You do know that "ecumenical" means something that promotes Christian unity? How can a controversial article be posted as an "ecumenical" thread when the vast majority of Christians would be offended by the implications of it?