Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NoKoolAidforMe
The ashes on the prosecutor’s forehead are not evidence.

"Are you suggesting, counselor, that the mark on Mr. Prosecutor's forehead is not a fact?"
[Judge stares balefully]

24 posted on 02/20/2010 6:51:14 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

“Are you suggesting, counselor, that the mark on Mr. Prosecutor’s forehead is not a fact?”

In order for the defense attorney to prove prejudice, he would have to provide evidence that the ashes are prejudicial. Merely pointing out the fact that the attorney has ashes on his forehead is not evidence.


30 posted on 02/20/2010 6:57:38 AM PST by Francis McClobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy

Evidence must be admitted to a court. Facts are not.


43 posted on 02/20/2010 7:06:11 AM PST by NoKoolAidforMe (1-20-09--The Beginning of an Error..............1-20-13--Change we can look forward to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson