Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBattman

I believe Jesus was contrasting the need to eat His flesh and drink His blood, over and against pagan worship that you referenced.

Obviously as a Protestant I believe the blood and wine are symbolic, not actual. But I believe the point of this Bible passage is the contrast with the surrounding pagan worship.

Jesus ate the bread and wine at the Last Supper, as most have seen illustrated in the great painting by Da Vinci. He was physically present there, body and blood. No one there seemed to be under the impression that parts of His body or servings of His blood were being served as He Himself sat there and partook with them.


7 posted on 03/10/2010 12:07:00 AM PST by Persevero ("Our culture is far better than a retarded Islamic culture." -Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
Obviously as a Protestant I believe the blood and wine are symbolic, not actual.

So did almost everyone else, until the Fourth Lateran Council, in 1215, invented the notion of transubstantiation out of whole cloth.

The doctrine of the Eucharist that was accepted semper, ubique, et ab omnibus, is that of the Real Presence.

8 posted on 03/10/2010 2:32:21 AM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson