The Rosary, a powerful weapon against the devil

http://www.michaeljournal.org/rosarypower.htm ^ | 2003 | Father Gabriel Amorth

[ArrogantBustard]

Hmmmm ... Perhaps I should ask, again:

Would all of the infallible interpreters of Scripture and inerrant arbiters of doctrine on this thread please identify themselves?

[Judith Anne]

Again, of course necromancy is a sin, but we will not stone you for it, just label you as heretical.

I am not a necromancer. See. even though you are an authority, you are not MY authority.

[Manic_Episode]

Judith Anne, your questions are not questions, they are accusations.

You have not provided even a single scripture reference to back up any of your opinions.

For at least the 2nd time you have put words in my mouth that I did not say, and that will be the last time I will respond to your nonsense. I'm bailing this conversation and saving it for someone who is honest.

I never said or implied that sarcasm was a sin, I simply pointed it out.

It seems to be all you have.

[Antoninus]

The Rosary has had a major impact on my life. And continues to do so.

[Judith Anne]

Good question!

[Judith Anne]

You seem confused about levitical law, as well. That is not sarcasm. Very little of what I wrote was sarcasm, it was intended to point out the self-contradictory nature of those who use the Scriptures as weapons against Catholics. I am very familiar with those sort of people. And using only the scripture YOU posted, I showed your error.

[Antoninus]

Praying to Mary is against the second commandment. No small error. Repent of it.

Says you. You've got about as much teaching authority as a shetland sheepdog.

Christians were asking for the intercession of the saints from the beginning--long before your sect was even a gleam in satan's eye.

[stylin19a]

clicked on the thread thinking I could contribute, based on the headline.
I’m guessing not.

you see, the nuns in the orphanage had rosary beads the size of golf balls. and many a time I was whacked with them with the nun screaming “you’re the devil”.

[Manic_Episode]

I'm sorry Judith Anne but inventing charges out of thin air is not pointing out error, it is inventing error, a dishonest and obnoxious approach at best.

I have very clearly stated twice that necromancy is a sin the same as adultery but you simply ignored that, bulldozed over it and went on to say that I must be saying that it's okay.

The irony is even richer in that you are the necromancer.

You are a lousy debater because you contribute no substance but only falsely accuse.

2 Timothy 3:16

16All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,

If you want to continue this discussion please use Gods Word to correct, rebuke, teach and train me and STOP with the dishonest attacks.

The proper way to debate doctrine is to state a verse and use HONEST reasoning to explain how that verse backs up your point. That's what Jesus did with the disciples, Pharisees and the devil.

Your approach is to lie and say that I said something I did not.

I'm probably wasting my breath.

[Antoninus]

It doesn’t have the same degree of authority like a Council of the Church or the dogmatic declaration of a pope. So, in that sense, it isn’t “infallible,” but since it’s written by a Father and Doctor of the Church, it is certainly given high regard.

Certainly much higher regard that the teachings of certain heresiarchs who lived 1,500 years and more after Our Lord...

[Hegewisch Dupa]

still trying to find the verse that states “Judith Anne is a necromancer”

[Antoninus]

Absolute idolatry. They weren't called the Dark Ages for nothing.

And to think, it only took 800 years for a Christian to call him out on it!

Unless, of course, you consider yourself one of the original followers of Constantine V Kopronymos.

[Manic_Episode]

Necromancy:

1 : conjuration of the spirits of the dead for purposes of magically revealing the future or influencing the course of events

Conjuration:

1 : the act or process of conjuring : incantation
2 : an expression or trick used in conjuring
3 : a solemn appeal

[Hegewisch Dupa]

I wonder which verse in the Book of Webster that’s from....

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Plus it’s gotta be sad following a religion where one believes the soul doesn’t have eternal life, and dies. Poor people - no wonder they are so often unhappy.

[Judith Anne]

I'm sorry Judith Anne but inventing charges out of thin air is not pointing out error, it is inventing error, a dishonest and obnoxious approach at best

I agree, and I accept your apology.

I have very clearly stated twice that necromancy is a sin the same as adultery but you simply ignored that, bulldozed over it and went on to say that I must be saying that it's okay.

You stated that gentiles are not subject to Levitical law. Did you forget that?

The irony is even richer in that you are the necromancer.

Define "necromancer." Because I am not a "necromancer."

You are a lousy debater because you contribute no substance but only falsely accuse.

Where have I falsely accused? And for what it's worth, I was arguing what YOU contributed. Why would I want to argue over what I contributed?

16All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,

The only Scripture that existed when this was written was the OT.

If you want to continue this discussion please use Gods Word to correct, rebuke, teach and train me and STOP with the dishonest attacks.

I'm not sure I want to continue this discussion.

The proper way to debate doctrine is to state a verse and use HONEST reasoning to explain how that verse backs up your point. That's what Jesus did with the disciples, Pharisees and the devil.

Well, He did that in the Sermon on the Mount, but I'm not sure that's the only way He debated doctrine.

Your approach is to lie and say that I said something I did not.

Please point out any lie I told.

I'm probably wasting my breath.

Oh WELL.

[Judith Anne]

LOL! This is an amazing morning.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

I’d love to know where in Scripture its declared the proper way to debate on FR is to be determined by....whoever that was - I forgot the name already. But you get the idea.

[Judith Anne]

I don’t think it’s ever a good idea to debate when the other guy makes all the rules.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

it is a heckuva lot easier to make up rules than actually present or defend a point