Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett
"Such parts of scripture are generally taken to be myth. For example it is scientifically inconceivable ..."

Generally taken by who? I can conceive of it quite easily. And please explain rationally why scientific conceivability is an essential foundation for metaphysical reality rather than just being one aspect of a larger construct?

20 posted on 04/14/2010 12:13:13 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

The lack of evidence supporting the truth in those creation mythologies, for instance. There’s better evidence supporting contrarian views. How do you contend with this issue, other than by faith?

Metaphysical reality pertaining to what? The creation mythologies?


21 posted on 04/14/2010 12:16:51 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson