Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg

So, there is no priest who has raped a 13 yo, in spite of the hysterical, anti-Catholic bigoted ranting?

Yes, I read the link I posted. Do you think the statute of limitations should be abolished? Do you think 20-50 yo allegations of child sexual abuse should be given ANY credibility? If so, why?


187 posted on 04/20/2010 12:07:40 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne; Alex Murphy; count-your-change
Judith, you showed your lack of knowledge in post 129 when you wrote...

Age of consent refers to the age which a person can legally consent to sexual activity. If that age is 15, are we talking about "child" abuse? What about 14?

In none of the 50 states is the age of consent for sexual activity 15 or 14.

You are the one drawing distinctions between misdemeanors and felonies regarding pederast priests either forcing or enticing 13-year-old boys into having sex with them.

The only people I've heard arguing the way you have tonight are members of NAMBLA.

191 posted on 04/20/2010 12:27:10 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson