And on January 2, 2014, when none of those things have happened, will you consider the possibility that your eschatology contains major errors?
Well, that particular "presentation" above has some pretty big problems, and I don't know what kind of "eschatology" it is -- really... because it certainly does not fit the eschatology of Dispensationalism, with the Pre-Millennial and Pre-Tribulational understanding.
Perhaps someone could give me what this particular one (described above) is called -- other than someone's "smorgasbord ideas" that they happened to "slap together" with no systematic thought whatsoever...
It's certainly not the systematic thought which is related to Pre-Millennialism, Pre-Tribulationalism and Dispensationalism.
Do y'all have any idea what it is? (and no, that's not an idle question, I'm really wondering...)
Perhaps someone could give me what this particular one (described above) is called -- other than someone's "smorgasbord ideas" that they happened to "slap together" with no systematic thought whatsoever...
You made this point much better than I did. Though I don't share your views, I can easily respect a systematic eschatology that differs from mine - after all, it's possible that I'm wrong. But this sort of slapdash headline-based "eschatology" gets nothing but ridicule from me - mostly because it's hilarious, but also because it's capable of causing real harm.
It's certainly not the systematic thought which is related to Pre-Millennialism, Pre-Tribulationalism and Dispensationalism.
It's also not the systematic thought related to any of the other views.