Skip to comments.Report Says Pope to Launch 'Pontifical Council for New Evangelization'
Posted on 04/25/2010 6:52:07 PM PDT by marshmallow
According to a report from a well-connected Italian Vatican writer, Pope Benedict XVI will shortly announce the creation of a Pontifical Council for the New Evangelization, to be presided over by Italian Archbishop Rino Fisichella. The office will be dedicated to rekindling the faith in the developed West, above all Europe and North America.
Assuming that report is correct, its striking for at least three reasons:
Its the first significant new structure in the Vatican created under Benedict XVI, reflecting his personal interest in the re-evangelization of traditional Christian lands in the West, where centuries of secularization have taken a steep toll;
The move would amount to a vindication for Fisichella, who has been under fire from some pro-life forces for an allegedly soft stance on abortion as President of the Pontifical Academy for Life;
Its also another trace of the influence of the Catholic movement Communion and Liberation upon Pope Benedict, since the suggestion for the creation of a Council for the New Evangelization first came from the movements late founder in the early 1980s.
The report was published in the Italian daily Il Giornale on Sunday, April 25, 2010, by veteran Vatican writer Andrea Tornielli. He wrote that a formal announcement of the new dicastery, meaning a department within the Vatican, will be made in coming weeks.
The term the New Evangelization was popularized by Pope John Paul II, who used it to refer to efforts to reawaken the faith in traditionally Christian parts of the world, particularly Europe. The idea was that while the developed West was first evangelized, or converted to Christianity, many centuries ago, today it stands in need of a new evangelization.
By way of background, Tornielli writes that the idea for a Council for the New Evangelization was first floated by Fr. Luigi Giussani, founder of the Communion and Liberation movement, in the early 1980s, but was not taken up by Pope John Paul II. More recently, Tornielli reports, Cardinal Angelo Scola of Venice, himself close to the Communion and Liberation movement, represented the idea to Benedict XVI.
Founded in Milan in 1954 by Giussani, Communion and Liberation was long seen as a more conservative alternative to the center-left ethos of the largest lay movement in Italy, Catholic Action. The movement's best-known leader in the United States is Monsignor Lorenzo Albacete, who has jokingly defined Communion and Liberation as "Opus Dei for lazy Catholics."
Benedicts fondness for Communion and Liberation is well known. Then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger delivered the homily at Giussanis funeral Mass in 2005, and a group of consecrated women who are part of the Memores Domini group within Communion and Liberation run Benedicts papal household.
When Ratzinger was elected to the papacy five years ago, many cardinals at the time said they had turned to him because they regarded him as the figure best equipped to respond to the crisis of secularization in the West, especially in Europe. His choice of name, Benedict, was in part a reference to St. Benedict, the founder of European monasticism.
In the intervening five years, a series of controversies and scandals during Benedicts pontificate most recently, the global sexual abuse crisis swirling around the Catholic church has often obscured that aim and arguably made it more difficult to realize, at least in the short term. Nevertheless, the creation of a new council suggests that Benedict has not thrown in the towel.
If Tornielli is correct in suggesting that Fisichella will be the first president of the new council, it amounts to a significant papal vote of confidence in one of his more embattled aides.
Fisichella is a well-known figure on the Italian scene, having served as Rector of the Lateran University and as chaplain to the Italian parliament. A philosopher by training, he and Ratzinger were primary advisors to John Paul II for his 1998 encyclical Fides et Ratio. In 2008, Benedict named Fisichella as President of the Pontifical Academy for Life, the Vaticans primary pro-life body of scholars and activists.
His role in Italian politics, his media savvy, and his background in philosophy rather than theology have all given Fisichella a profile as someone who knows how to talk to the secular world, making him a logical candidate to head a council dedicated to re-evangelizing the West.
Fisichella is also an ambivalent figure, however, for some of the churchs most staunchly pro-life forces, as a result of his role in a 2009 controversy from Brazil involving an abortion for a nine-year-old girl. The girl had become pregnant after reportedly being raped by her stepfather, and her mother arranged for an abortion. Archbishop Jose Cardoso Sobrinho of Olinda and Recife, upon learning of the case, announced that the mother, the doctor, and others involved in the abortion were excommunicated.
Sobrinhos position aroused widespread protest in Brazil and around the world, but drew swift backing from Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, prefect of the Vaticans Congregation for Bishops. Fisichella, however, then penned a front-page essay in LOsservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, that appeared to criticize Sobrinho.
Before giving thought to excommunication, it was necessary and urgent to safeguard the innocent life of this girl, and return her to a level of humanity of which we, men of the church, should be expert heralds and teachers, Fisichella wrote.
What is needed now, he added, is the sign of a testimony of closeness with the one suffering, an act of mercy that, even while firmly maintaining the principle, is able to look beyond the juridical sphere.
That article brought protests both from bishops in Brazil and from pro-life activists all over the world, resulting in a July 10 clarification from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith indicating that church teaching on abortion has not changed and will not change.
Within the Pontifical Academy for Life, a group of members led by Belgian Monsignor Michel Schooyans wrote a lengthy letter calling for Fisichellas removal, arguing that he had falsely invoked the concept of compassion to justify actions contrary to Christian morality. Nonetheless, Fisichella has remained on the job.
If he indeed becomes the head of the new pontifical council, that would put Fisichella in line to become a cardinal, and, at least in theory, potentially a candidate to be the next pope suggesting that his stock has not been overly damaged by the Brazilian affair.
Pontifical Councils are a largely post-Second Vatican Council (1962-65) addition to Vatican structures, and are generally considered less powerful than the older Congregations, which exercise decision-making authority in the name of the pope in some specific area. Councils, on the other hand, are more akin to think tanks set up to promote a good cause: the family, Christian unity, justice and peace, and so on.
Because most pontifical councils are focused on the outside world rather than internal church politics, however, they can often have an important impact in shaping public perceptions of the Catholic church.
Students of Vatican strategy will note that putting the liberal in charge of the conservative movement is designed to neutralize the liberal, not compromise the movement as is suggested in the article.
“Promoting” people out of a job they’re failing at is a common if unfortunate means of addressing problems in large organizations and particularly in the Church.
The archbishop is not quite 60. Sacking him outright wasn't an option (no good comes from idle minds) - and so he was moved somewhere where he would be less of a lightning rod and that would better fit his talents.
Unfortunately, I don't see any other good options, unless the Vatican has 20 years worth of desk-work to keep him busy enough to not speak publicly on anything.