Your tactics are getting old. If you read my replies, you should have understood that issue is not whether 2Tim. 3:16 states Scripture is simply “good”, but that Scripture is the only objective (material) authority that is affirmed to be 100% inspired by God, and able to enable one to be saved, and to reprove, correct, instruct, That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. (2ti. 3:15-17)
The authority of the Scriptures, which are inspired of God whether recognized by men or not, provides for the church magisterium, (Eph. 4:11) but whose teaching we not assured will always be infallible because it speaks according to a formula, but whose teachings in the N.T. are Scripturally substantiated, and noble souls examine even apostolic teachings by the Scriptures, (Acts 17:11) rather than giving them implicit trust, as Rome requires.
“Post 203 — what’s the question in it?”
I did not say there was a question in it. What are you reading? It is not questions, but refutations of your attempted polemic, including your reliance upon the fallacious argument that is something is not explicitly stated, then it is not valid. From a man who believes in transubstantiation no less.