Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

I had never heard of this lady until a friend sent the link to me. I thought some others might like to learn of her too.
1 posted on 06/17/2010 3:53:24 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7

Thank you for a very interesting, and inspirational read!


2 posted on 06/17/2010 4:05:55 PM PDT by 21twelve ( UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES MY ARSE: "..now begin the work of remaking America."-Obama, 1/20/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
Two things deserve mention...

As I recall torturing a woman on the rack was illegal at that time. Wriothesley was so blind with anger he broke the king's law.

Second, again, as I recall they did put a bag of gunpowder around her neck as an act of mercy. Funny way of showing mercy, I know, but given what happened to some of the reformers (read: Jan Hus) that was a much better way to go.

3 posted on 06/17/2010 4:10:50 PM PDT by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

Her prosecution and execution where featured in the latest episode of The Tudors on Showtime.


4 posted on 06/17/2010 4:18:05 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
Okay...I confessed I'm a fan of The Tudors on Showtime.:o)

The case of Anne Askew was part of the episode this last Sunday night. Chancellor Wriothesley and Bishop Gardiner were shown participating in the rack torture of Anne in an attempt to force her to name Queen Catherine Parr (Henry VIII's sixth wife) as a heretic. She would not name anyone and did not denounce her faith. She was a true martyr and the so-called "men of the cloth" that persecuted and murdered her in no way show a true faith and love of Christ. I am SO glad I wasn't born back then and I truly appreciate the freedoms we have in America.

5 posted on 06/17/2010 4:28:53 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
In 1545, Anne was examined by church leaders concerning her beliefs. Her answers were full of wisdom and quotes from the Holy Scriptures, and she often out-maneuvered the inquisitors pointing out the contradictions in their own position.

Just as a point of information, Ms. Askew's persecutors were not "inquisitors" (in the strict sense), and they were not Catholics, but Anglicans.

The "Act of Supremacy," declaring Henry VII "Supreme Head of the Church in England," and stating that the Pope had no authority in England, passed Parliament in 1534. Henry died in January of 1547.

Someone (like me, for example) who affirmed the Papacy in England in 1546 would have been executed right alongside Ms. Askew.

6 posted on 06/17/2010 5:28:36 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

Thank you for that article Rn! What an uplifting and inspirational story.


7 posted on 06/17/2010 6:06:50 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
All due respect

Just for the record

"She was offered one last chance at a pardon if she would renounce the doctrines of the Reformation and embrace Catholicism."

This title "embrace Catholicism."

"This should read traditionalist before they came up with word anglicanism."

They were not Catholic in 1546. Her husband was Catholic.

She did not believe in the real presence eucharist. Which both Catholic and Anglicanism believed.

So the state church (Anglicanism) killed her. King Henry V111 became the head of the church of england. Thats after he renounced the Church of Rome.So he could marry again.

But he still hated reformation people outside of England.

But what a matryr!

Thanks for Post.

8 posted on 06/17/2010 6:33:08 PM PDT by johngrace (God so loved the world so he gave his only son! Praise Jesus and Hail the Virgin Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7

“Anne had acquired a copy of the English Bible and had studied it enthusiastically.”

As I understand it, for some reason the Vatican wasn’t really thrilled with the idea of the laity learning to read, especially the Holy Bible. What I have never been able to figure out is....why?


9 posted on 06/17/2010 6:59:54 PM PDT by Grunthor (Getting married, T minus 10 days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson